M/S. Sri Lakshmi Venkateshwara Rice & Flour… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Venkateshwara Rice & Flour… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

% t '

APHC010035902013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

WRIT PETITION NO: 31745 OF 2013

Between:

M/s. Sri Lakshmi Venkateshwara Rice & Flour Mill, (JRG 04450), Chintalapudi, West Godavari Dt Rep.by its Prop M.Srinivasa Rao S/ o Nagabushanam, age 44 years.

...PETITIONER

AND

Senior Accounts Officer Operation, Eastern Power Distribution of Company A.P Ltd., Elurur, WestGodavari District

Assistant Accounts Officer, Eastern Power Distribution of Company A.P Ltd., Jangareddygudem, WestGodavari District

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof} Wirt of Mandamus declaring the demand of Rs.1,19,372.77Ps as FSA charges as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional without principles of natural justice and direct the respondents not to take any cohesive steps of disconnection of power supply to the petitioner Rice Mill Unit by permitting the petitioner to pay September 2013 Monthly consumption bill Rs. 54,799.

lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 39446 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disconnect the power supply to the petitioner for nonpayment of the September 2013 bill issued to the petitioner for Rs. 1,19,372.77Ps as FSA charges by permitting the petitioner to pay balance Rs. 54,799 consumption bill.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. V. UPENDRA GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI V. V. SATISH (SC for

APEPDCL)

The Court made the following order:

IP

e

APHC010035902013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

[3331]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

WRIT PETITION NO: 31745/2013

Between:

I.M/S. SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA RICE & FLOUR MILL, (JRG 04450),CHINTALAPUDI , WEST GODAVARI DT REP.BY ITS PROP M.SRINIVASA RAO S/ O NAGABUSHANAM AGE 44 YEARS.

...PETITIONER

AND

1.SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OPERATION, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY A.P LTD ELURUR, WESTGODAVARI DISTRICT

2.ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION OF COMPANY A.P LTD JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WESTGODAVARI DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wirt of Mandamus declaring the demand of Rs. 1,19,372.77Ps^asFSA charges as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional without principles of natural justice and direct the respondents not to take any cohesive steps of disconnection of power supply to the petitioner Rice Mill Unit by permiting the petitioner to pay September 2013 Monthly consumption bill Rs 54,799 and pass.

lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 39446 OF 2013

2

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents not to disconnect the power supply to the petitioner for nonpayment of the September 2013 bill issued to the petitioner for Rs. 1,19,372.77Ps as FSA charges by permiting the petitioner to pay balance Rs 54,799 consumption bill.

Counsel for the Petitioner;

1.KVUPENDRA GUPTA

Counsel for the Respondent{S):

VV SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

The Court made the following order:

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions^{shallstandclosed.}

Sd/- J. SAROJA

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri K. V. Upendra Gupta, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri V. V. Satish (SC for APEPDCL) [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies

ssb

-is

HIGH COURT

DATED:03/07/2025

ORDER WP No.31745 OF 2013

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS