Disposed¶31

Vyshno Constructions v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Dec 2025WP/31729/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati - Writ Petition No. 31729/2025 - Vyshno Constructions v. State of A.P. (R&B and Finance Departments) and R&B Engineers - payment of amounts due to petitioner confirmed as received (Executive Engineer R&B written instructions dated 18.11.2025) - writ petition disposed of on 09.12.2025 by Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad - no order as to costs - interlocutory applications closed.

What did the court decide?

The Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer (R & B) dated 18.11.2025 indicated that the amounts have been paid. ¶28

Vyshno Constructions Vs the State of Ap — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010603122025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 31729/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

VYSHNO CONSTRUCTIONS, H NO 1-207, CHINNA VEEDHI UBALANKA VILLAGE,RAVULAPALEM MANDAL DR BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER CH. V . KRISHNA REDDY

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY,R AND B DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶15

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, R AND B DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

¶16

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B,CIRCLE, KAKINADA..

¶17

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, DIVISION, AMALAPURAM

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.CH B R P SEKHAR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶22

1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

¶23

2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

ORAL ORDER:

¶26

Heard Sri Sk. Sardam Hussain, learned Counsel representing Sri Ch.B.R. Sekhar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings

¶27

Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer (R & B), dated 18.11.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record.

¶28

The Written Instructions would indicate that the amounts have been paid.

¶29

Sri Sk. Sardam Hussain, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner sought a pass over to obtain instructions.

¶30

Upon obtaining instructions, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner confirms that the Petitioner has received the amounts and therefore no further consideration in this Writ Petition is necessary.

¶31

Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶32

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

¶33

_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

Dt: 09.12.2025

DSV

121

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO: 31729/2025

¶39

09.12.2025

¶40

DSV

¶41

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI

¶42

MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 31729/2025

¶43

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶44

Sl. No	DATE	ORDER
2.	09.12.2025	GRKP, J
		Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order)
		DSV	___________ GRKP, J

Vyshno Constructions v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vyshno Constructions v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D Ayyapa Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

P. Gayasuddin, Ysr Dist Vs Chairman & M.D., Apspdcl, Chittoor Dist & 15 Ot

S.B.Shamshuddin, Y.S.R.District Vs Chairman & Md, Apspdcl, Chittoor Dist & 2 Others

M/s. Ab Constructions and Co., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dondeti Dhana Lakshmi Vs The Assistant Accounts Officer

Gollavalli Satyanarayana, Vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh