Disposed¶31

MD Nizamuddin v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Jul 2025WP/297/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court, Amaravati; W.P. No. 297 of 2019 (MD Nizamuddin v. State of AP and others); decided 09.07.2025 by Dr Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa. Article 226 mandamus petition by a Home Guard challenging suspension order of Superintendent of Police, Ananthapuramu (Proceedings C.No.13031/H1/2008, D.O.No.908/2018) as illegal, unjustified and violative of natural justice; petition disposed of after counsel reported the petitioner's death about three years earlier; no adjudication on merits; no order as to costs; pending applications (incl. I.A. No. 1 of 2019 under Section 151 CPC) closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was disposed of on the recording that the petitioner had died, with no order as to costs. ¶31

MD Nizamuddin Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010007932019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNE S DAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 297 OF 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

MD NIZAMUDDIN, S/o Mohd. Rukmudclin, aged 36 years, O cc- Home Guard No. 4.30, R/o H. N o. 13-1-45, Gandhinagar Colony, A nanthapur, Ananthapur District-515001

¶9

.Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF AP, R e p. by its Principal Secretary, Home D epartment, Secretariat, Amaravathi, G u ntur District

¶12

The Director General o f Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, M angalagiii, Guntur District.

¶13

The Addl Director Ge n eral of Police, Home Guards, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagirl, Gun t ur Ditrict.

¶14

The Inspector General o f Police Home Guards, State of Andh r a Pradesh, Mangalagix i, Guntur Distri c t.

¶15

The Superintendent of P o lice, Ananthapuramu, A.P.,

¶16

The Commandant, Hom e Guards, Kurnool, A.P..

¶17

The Reserve Insp e ctor, I/C Home Guards (Armed Reserve) Ananthapuramu, AP.

¶18

...Respondents

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order passed by the Superintendent of Pollice, Ananthapuramu suspending the petitioner from service vide Proceedings C.No. 13031/H1/2008- D.O.No. 908/2018 as illegal, unjustified and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: M NAGA RAGHU

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents:

¶24

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO: 297 OF 2019

¶26

The Court made the following order:

¶27

s This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with

¶28

the following prayer for:

¶29

“…pleased to issue any appropriate Writ Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the Superintendent of Pollice Ananthapuramu suspending the petitioner from service vide Proceedings C.No.13031/H1/2008 D.O.No.908/2018 as illegal unjustified and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same…”

¶30

Sri M.Nagha Raghu, learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no more, he died about three years back and the petition may be disposed of.

¶31