M Murthi Prasad Vs The State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

M Murthi Prasad Vs The State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

APHC010046412018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3396]

TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2050/2018

Between:

M MURTHI PRASAD, 0CC GOVT. EMPLOYEE R/O.DOOR NO.26981-01, MITTAMUDI 3RD STREET RAMESHWARAM VILLAGE, PRODDATUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER

AND

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.

THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, A.P.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT KURNOOL, A.P.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, A.P.

THE CHAIRMAN, SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

SRI G RAMANA REDDY, CHAIRMAN, SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

SRI MADDIMANU GURRAPPA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER GURRAPPAGARIPALLI (V), PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2^nd Respondent in issuing proceedings vide Rc.No.V3/20026/80/2017-2, dt.09.01.2018 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide Memo Rc.No.A2/305/2018/Eos.,Estt, dt.11.01.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Charitable and

2

Hindu Institutions and Endowments Executive Officers (Conduct) Rules 1978, and set aside the same

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.T RAJINIKANTH REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.T VENUGOPAL

2.RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA

The Court made the following:

ORDER :

The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of

this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

“ ... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2^nd Respondent in issuing proceedings vide Rc.No.V3/20026/80/2017-2, dt.09.01.2018 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide Memo Rc.No.A2/305/2018/Eos.,Estt, dt.11.01.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Institutions and Endowments Executive Officers (Conduct) Rules 1978, and set aside the same ....”

When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II would submit

that suspension of the Petitioner was revoked and thereafter he got promotion

and no further orders are necessary.

In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Mjl/*

3

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Writ Petition No. 2050 of 2018

08.07.2025

Mjl /*