Bulla Vijaya Lakshmi Vs State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

Bulla Vijaya Lakshmi Vs State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of respondents 2 to 3 in not considering the petitioner's Spandana representation dated 9.5.2022 (Request No.GNT202205092137) seeking assignment of land in Mandadam revenue village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution, warranting a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2 to 4 to consider the request within a time bound programme. (Raised by the prayer; not adjudicated, as the petition was withdrawn.) +1 more

Ratio / Principle

Permission is accorded to the request of learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

Key takeaways

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for, and there shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶¶26
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

WRIT PETITION No.2740 of 2023 — Bulla Vijaya Lakshmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others — High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction) — Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao — decided 09.10.2025. The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution prayed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 to 3 in not considering the petitioner's Spandana representation dated 9.5.2022 vide Request No.GNT202205092137 for assignment of Ac.1.08 cents in D.No.589/19, Ac.1.02 cents in D.No.1A-4 and Ac.1.31 cents in D.No.599-1 of Mandadam revenue village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution, and for directions to respondents 2 to 4 to consider the request within a time bound programme. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, the request being endorsed on the bundle. Permission was accorded; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for, with no order as to costs, and pending interlocutory applications, if any, were closed. No substantive adjudication of the assignment grievance occurred in this petition.

APHC010055532023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3330]

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.2740 of 2023

Between:

BULLA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O PULI PADMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VUDDANDURAYUNIPALEM VILLAGE, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR.

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

THE TAHASILDAR, THULLUR MANDAL, THULLUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 3 in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 9.5.2022 submitted under Spandana vide Request No.GNT202205092137 for assignment of land Ac.1.08 cents in D.No.589/19, Ac.1.02 cents in D.No.1A-4 and Ac.1.31 cents in D.No.599-1 of Mandadam revenue village, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation for assignment of above extents of land within a time bound programme.

2

Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHAGIRI RAO ULLAM

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

3

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition and the same is also endorsed on the bundle.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 09.10.2025

siva

4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.2740 of 2023

Date: 09.10.2025

siva