Writ petition against railway authorities dismissed for non-prosecution after no appearance by either side on multiple listings; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3506]
APHC010059192004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Bench Sr.No:-12
WRIT PETITION NO: 24642 of 2004
G.Munemma @ Chittem Munemma
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Secretary for Railways, New Delhi 2 and Others
...Respondent(s)
Advocate for Petitioner: A M KRISHNA Advocate for Respondent: G S SANGHI
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
DATE : 13th November 2025
ORDER:
There was no representation either for petitioner or for
respondents on earlier occasion, i.e., on 22.09.2025. Therefore, the matter was posted to 06.11.2025. Even on that day, none appeared either for petitioner or for respondents. Hence, the matter was again directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. Even today, none appeared either for petitioner or for respondents. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition.
2
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if
any in this case, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Date:13.11.2025.
cs
G.Munemma @ Chittem Munemma
The Secretary for Railways, New Delhi
Challa Gunaranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
