Disposed¶18

Dr K Vara Sai Prasad v. Shanthi Priya, S

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Nov 2025CC/1726/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt case closed at hearing; impleadment of Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education refused; inaction of third-party authority outside scope of writ petition order; liberty to file separate proceedings against inaction; compliance orders dated 23.06.2025 by Accountant General (A&E) A.P.; representations dated 27.02.2024 and 16.11.2024; petitioner's proceedings dated 29.08.2025; no costs; misc petitions closed as sequel; Challa Gunaranjan J.; APHC010331802025; CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1726 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings questioning the inaction of the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education; the Contempt Case stands closed with no order as to costs. ¶18

Dr K Vara Sai Prasad Vs Shanthi Priya, S — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether any further direction can be issued to the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, whose inaction was not the subject matter of challenge in the writ petition. +1 more

¶17

Court's answer

The Court declined to issue any further direction to the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, since his inaction was not the subject matter of challenge in the writ petition, the writ order being confined to consideration of the petitioner's representation by the respondent.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

Rather than entertaining the impleadment of the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education in the contempt proceedings, the petitioner was granted liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings questioning such inaction.

¶18

Key takeaways

The Contempt Case was closed with no order as to costs, and as a sequel all miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the case stand closed.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt — closure with liberty; impleadment refused. In Contempt Case No. 1726 of 2025 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Challa Gunaranjan, J., 07.11.2025), the respondent (Accountant General (A&E), A.P., Vijayawada) filed a counter stating that, pursuant to the final orders in the writ petition and considering the petitioner's representations dated 27.02.2024 and 16.11.2024, orders were passed on 23.06.2025 advising the petitioner to route his application through the concerned Department. The petitioner, having addressed the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education by proceedings dated 29.08.2025 and alleging that the said Authority took no further steps, sought its impleadment as a proposed respondent. HELD: (i) no further direction could be issued to the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, as his inaction was not the subject matter of challenge in the writ petition, the order therein being confined to consideration of the petitioner's representation by the respondent; (ii) liberty was granted to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings questioning such inaction; (iii) the Contempt Case accordingly stood closed, with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed as a sequel.

Dr K Vara Sai Prasad v. Shanthi Priya, S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr K Vara Sai Prasad v. Shanthi Priya, S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Padmanabha Naidu Vs the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and 2 Others

D.Mallikarjuna Reddy, Anantapur. Vs Presiding Officer, Ind.Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court,&Ano

Ch.Venkateswara Rao, W.G.Dist., & 11 Ors. Vs the Dist.Co.Op.Officer, W.G.Dist., & 2 Others

S.Krishna Rao, Vs D.Mariyanna

Bathula Siva Rama Krishna Vs Smt a Thameem Ansariya IAS

Village Horticulture Assistants Welfare Association Vs M Shiva Prasad (Ifs)