Pothuri Siva Shankar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Sk Khaja Mohinuddin, S/o. not known to the petitioner, aged about 55 years, Occ. Real Estate Business, R/o. 1st lane, Besides Petrol Bunk, Brundavan Guardan, Guntur, Guntur District.

¶17

...Respondents

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction on the part of the 3rd

¶19

Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.2349 of 2022

¶20

respondent on reports dt.02-08-2021 and 13-12-2021 ss per the ednrosement of the 2nd respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and also under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of atrocities) Act 1989 and offends Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents to register crime on my reports as a case and undertake investigation in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and prosecute the real culprits and pass such

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: G RAJU

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶23

Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.2349 of 2022

¶24

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶25

This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer:

¶26

“… to issue Writ, order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent on reports dt.02-08-2021 and 13-12-2021 ss per the ednrosement of the 2nd respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and also under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of atrocities) Act 1989 and offends Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents to register crime on my reports as a case and undertake investigation in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and prosecute the real culprits …

¶27

It is represented that since the counsel on record has become Government Pleader, there is a need to change of vakalat in the matter.

¶28

At this juncture, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the complaint which was given by the petitioner in Spandana is closed since the matter is of civil in nature.

¶29