Chilakuri Munivardhan Reddy Vs the State of Ap

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent No.5 in delete the name of the Petitioner in Record of Rights pertaining to land to an extent of Ac.0.13 Cents in Sy.No.319-13, L.P No.219 of Arlapadu Village, Pellakur Mandal, without issuing notice and incorporate the name of the Respondent No.6 and there by Respondent No.4 not disposing the Appeal

¶20

2

¶21

presented by the Petitioner on 09-09-2024 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of provisions of A.P Rights in Land Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Violation of Article-14, 21 and 300-A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to restore the name of the Petitioner in Record of Rights in pertaining to the land to an extent of Ac.0.13 Cents in Sy.No.319-13, L.P No.219 of Arlapadu Village, Pellakur Mandal and pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to dispose of the Appeal filed by the Petitioner on 09-09-2024, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and pass

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.HARINATH REDDY SOMA

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

3

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.22713 of 2025

¶31

ORDER:-

¶32

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

¶33

“… to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in deleting the name of the petitioner in record of rights pertaining to land to an extent of Ac.0.13 cents in Sy.No.319-13, L.P.No.219 of Arlapadu village, Pellakur Mandal, without issuing notice and incorporate the name of the respondent No.6 and thereby respondent No.4 not disposing the appeal presented by the petitioner on 09.09.2024 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to restore the name of the petitioner in record of rights pertaining to subject property and pass such order ….”

¶34

Heard Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for petitioner

¶35

and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

¶36

The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal dated 09.09.2024 pending before the 4^th respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer.

¶37

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the appellate authority is bound to decide the case in accordance with the law expeditiously. Hence, pleaded to direct the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal in a time-bound manner in accordance with law.

¶38

4

¶39

Ergo, this Court directs the 4^th respondent appellate authority to make an endeavor, or to put to an end, by making all the efforts, in deciding the case with due diligence within a reasonable time for disposal of the appeal on merits and as per law, after hearing all the parties to the dispute, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not beyond three (03) months from date of receipt of a copy this order.

¶40