Dismissed¶¶29

Nallamakala Kamalakar Babu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Sept 2025WP/7395/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; mandamus; mutation of land records; correction of Computerized Adangal and 1-B (ROR); Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Survey No. 180/5, Manavali Village, Ojili Mandal, Tirupati District; representation dated 21.02.2025; withdrawal letter dated 30.08.2025; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; WP No.7395 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; no substantive relief granted on the merits. ¶¶29

Nallamakala Kamalakar Babu Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; no substantive relief granted on the merits.

¶¶29

Issue for consideration

Whether the inaction of the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent, in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2025 for correction of the Computerized Adangal and 1-B (ROR) records (which showed the land in the name of the 5th respondent) and for mutation of the petitioner's name in respect of Ac. 2.00 cents in Survey No. 180/5 of Manavali Village, Ojili Mandal, Tirupati District, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

¶¶18

Ratio / Principle

On the basis of the letter dated 30.08.2025 addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission to withdraw was accorded and the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

¶¶29

Key takeaways

As a sequel to the dismissal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed.ratio¶¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent (Revenue Divisional Officer, Sullurupet), in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2025 for correction of the Computerized Adangal and 1-B (ROR) records — which showed Ac. 2.00 cents in Survey No. 180/5 of Manavali Village, Ojili Mandal, Tirupati District in the name of the 5th respondent — and for mutation of the petitioner's name in online land revenue records, alleging contravention of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and Articles 14, 21 and 300-A. Before adjudication, the petitioner's counsel addressed a letter dated 30.08.2025 to the Registry requesting listing under the caption 'For Withdrawal'; on 02.09.2025 there was no representation for the petitioner. Held: permission accorded; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, closed. (Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, J.)

¶1

APHC010143242025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3330]

¶4

TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION No.7395 of 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

NALLAMAKALA KAMALAKAR BABU, S/O. LATE N. KASTURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANAVALI VILLAGE, OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI.

¶14

REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶15

TAHSILDAR, OJILI MANDAD, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶16

SAKAMURI SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU, S/O. SWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. MUMAYAPALEM VILLAGE, S T COLONY, OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the in action of respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent in not consider of my representation dated 21.02.2025 submitted for Correction in Computerized Adangal and 1 B (ROR) Shows in the name of 5th respondent and also to mutate my name in all online web land revenue

¶19

¶20

records that are being maintained by the 4th respondent for my agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac. 2.00 cents Covered by Survey No. 180/5 of Manavali Village in ojili Mandal of Tirupati District and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on 3rd respondent under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22

1.MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶24

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

The petitioner’s counsel addressed a letter dated 30.08.2025 (part of record) to the Registry requesting to list the present case under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is listed today i.e., on 02.09.2025, under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶29

Basing on the letter addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is accorded and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

Date: 02.09.2025

siva

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶36