Dismissed¶53

Oleti Rupendra Kumar v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Sept 2025WP/21299/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Nyapathy Vijay, J.; W.P. No. 21299 of 2025; Oleti Rupendra Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Director General of Police and State Level Police Recruitment Board; Police Constable (civil) recruitment; Home Guard Quota; Hall Ticket no. 5977110882; notification dt. 28-11-2022; Vijayawada city / Krishna District; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of Mandamus; Section 151 CPC; withdrawal letter dated 03.09.2025; no order as to costs; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. ¶53

Oleti Rupendra Kumar Vs the State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010412192025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) i'i.'

¶3

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

the honourable SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 21299 OF

¶7

Between:

¶8

Oleti Rupendra Kumar, S/o. late Nageswar Rao, Aged about 34 years, Occ Home Guard, R/o. D. No. 30/700, Chinnavulingipalem, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1- The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, Home

¶12

Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, AP.

¶13

1. The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

¶14

State Level Police Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3'^^ respondent in not selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, despite the vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3'"^ respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} ■ in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3"'^ respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following order:

¶21

[3460]

¶22

APHC010412192025

¶23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶24

AT AMARAVATI

¶25

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶26

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶27

PRESENT

¶28

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶29

WRIT PETITION NO: 21299/2025

¶30

Between:

¶31

1.0LETI RUPENDRA KUMAR, S/0. LATE NAGESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC HOME GUARD, R/0. D. NO. 30/700, CHINNAVULINGIPALEM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶32

...PETITIONER

¶33

AND

¶34

1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AP.

¶35

2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶36

3.STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT{S):

¶37

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the

¶38

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof} writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, despite the vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt.28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and

¶39

¶40

consequently direct the 3'" respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner and pass such

¶41

lA NO: 1 OF 2C)7R

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i ; support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased y be pleased to direct the 3' respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible 28 'he notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, and pass such

¶43

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶44

1.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶46

1.GP FOR SERVICES I

¶47

The Court made the following:

¶48

¶49

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶50

W.P.No.21299 of 2025

¶51

ORDER:

¶52

Sri I.Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 03.09.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present petition.

¶53