Dismissed¶54

Galanki Sandeep Kumar, v. The State of A.P.

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Sept 2025WP/21177/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal order - Galanki Sandeep Kumar v. State of A.P., DGP and State Level Police Recruitment Board; police constable recruitment 2022 notification; Home Guard quota selection grievance; dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's request dated 03.09.2025; no costs; no merits examined.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the Writ Petition; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. ¶54

Galanki Sandeep Kumar, Vs The State of A.P. — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010409862025

¶2

QMS

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER j tWo THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 21177 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Galanki Sandeep Kumar, S/o. Late Nageswar Rao, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Home Guard, R/o. 2-52, Water tank road, Davaluru village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

The State of /^ndhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, AP.

¶11

The Director G3neral of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

¶12

State level Police Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated n the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof} writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket No. 4193577) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, despite the vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada

¶15

city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 4193577) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I

¶20

The Court made the following order:

¶21

APHC010409862025

¶22

[3460]

¶23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶24

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶25

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶26

PRESENT

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶28

WRIT PETITION NO: 21177/2025

¶29

Between:

¶30

1.GALANKI SANDEEP KUMAR,, S/0. LATE NAGESWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC HOME GUARD, R/0. 2-52, WATER TANK ROAD, DAVALURU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT

¶31

...PETITIONER

¶32

AND

¶33

1.THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AP.

¶34

2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶35

STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶36

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶37

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof} writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 4193577) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, despite the vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and

¶38

¶39

'>1

¶40

consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner

¶41

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 4193577) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, pursuant to the notification dt.28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District,

¶43

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶44