Syed Basha, Anantapur District. v. the Regional Manager, Apsrtc, Anantapur & Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, W.P. No. 20384/2004 (APHC010089132004), decided 22.09.2025 by Justice Ravi Cheemalapati: writ petition DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION — petitioner unrepresented on the hearing date and on 12.07.2024; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed. Underlying claim (never adjudicated): mandamus directing APSRTC respondents to pay salary computed with notional increments for the out-of-employment period from termination 31-8-1990 to reinstatement 4-9-1993; Article 226 petition; IA No. 1 of 2004 / WPMP No. 26677 of 2004 under Section 151 CPC. Counsel: Y Subba Rao (petitioner); W V S Rajeswari (respondents). Keywords: dismissal for non-prosecution; notional increments; termination-to-reinstatement salary; APSRTC; writ of mandamus; Article 226.
What did the court decide?
None; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs, and as a sequel all pending miscellaneous applications were closed.