Dismissed¶78

G.Ramakrishna v. The State of a.p.

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Jul 2025WP/1703/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: infructuous writ petition; Article 226 mandamus; A.P Cooperative Societies Act 1964 Section 155-D(2)(iv); cooperative society secretary service; general body resolution 30/09/2015; proceedings No. 1231/2017-D dated 20/09/2017; Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Peddapuram; interim order 24.01.2018 in IA No.1 of 2018; IA No.2 of 2018 under Section 151 CPC to vacate interim order; dismissal without costs; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; W.P. No. 1703 of 2018; decided 02/07/2025; single judge Dr Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and as a sequel miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were directed to stand closed. ¶78

G.Ramakrishna Vs The State of a.p. — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010039132018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1703 OF 2018

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.Ramakrishna, S/o Ramudu, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Secretary of Mallepalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society^Limited R/o Mallepali Village, Gandepalli Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of A.P, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Village, Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State.

¶12

The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Commissioner for Cooperation, A.P. Skylark Towers, D. No.2-16-83, 11 th Lane, Shyamala Nagar, Guntur-52206.

¶13

The District Cooperative Officer, East Godavari At Kakinada.

¶14

The Deputy Registrar of Cooperatives Societies, Peddapuram East Godavari District.

¶15

Mallepalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Mallepalli Village, Gandepalli Mandal, East Godavari District, Rep. by its President

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶18

pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the fourth respondent vide proceedings No. 1231/2017-D dated 20/09/2017, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Section 155-D(2)(iv) of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Consequently direct the fifth respondent Society to continue the petitioner in its services in pursuance of the resolution of the general body dated 30/09/2015.

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2ni«

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the fifth respondent Society to continue the Petitioner in its services in / pursuance of the resolution of the general body dated 30/09/2015 pending disposal of above Writ petition.

¶21

lA NO: 2 OF 2ni«

¶22

Between:

¶23

The State of A.P, Rep. bits Principal Secretary, Cooperation

¶24

Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Village Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State.

¶25

The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Commissioner for

¶26

Cooperation, A.P, Skylark Towers, D. No.2-16-83, 11"’ Lane, Shyamala Nagar, Guntur-52206.

¶27

The District Cooperative Officer, East Godavari At Kakinada.

¶28

The Deputy Registrar of Cooperatives Societies, Peddapuram, East Godavari District.

¶29

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶30

AND

¶31

G.Ramakrishna, S/o Ramudu, Aged about r 58 years, Occ: Secretary of

¶32

Mallepalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, R/o

¶33

Mallepali Village. Gandepalli Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶34

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶35

Mallepalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Mallepalli Village, Gandepalli Mandal, East Godavari District, Rep. by its President

¶36

...respondent/respondent

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated.24.01.2018 in lA No.1 of 2018 in W P No 1703 Of 2018.

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 X- to 4: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.5:—

¶39

The Court made the following order:

¶40

APHC010039132018

¶41

[3396]

¶42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶43

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶44

WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶45

PRESENT

¶46

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶47

WRIT PETITION NO: 1703/2018

¶48

Between:

¶49

1.G.RAMAKRISHNA, S/0 RAMUDU.OCC. SECRETARY OF MALLEPALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTLURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETLY LIMITED, R/0 MALLEPALI VILLAGE, GANDEPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶50

...PETITIONER

¶51

AND

¶52

1.THE STATE OF A P, REP. BITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAR, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

¶53

2.THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND COMMISSIONER, FOR COOPERATION, A.P. SKLARK TOWERS, D. NO. 2-16-83, 11TH LANE, SHYAMALA NAGAR, GUNTUR-52206.

¶54

3.THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI AT KAKINADA.

¶55

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVES SOCIETIES, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARIDISTRICT.

¶56

5.MALLEPALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COPPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, MALLEPALLI VILIj^GE, GANDEPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT

¶57

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶58

¶59

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the fourth respondent vide proceedings NO 1231/2017-D dated 20/09/2017, as illegal. Arbitrary and contrary to Section 155-D(2)(iv) of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Consequently direct the fifth respondent Society to continue the petitioner in its services in pursuance of the resolution of the general body dated 30/09/2015 and to pass

¶60

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶61

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To Direct the fifth respondent Society to continue the Petitioner^inits services in pursuance of the resolution of the general body dated 30/09/2015 pending disposal of above Writ petition.

¶62

lA NO: 2 OF 2018

¶63

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order passed in lA No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.1703 of 2018, dated.24.01.2018 and pass

¶64

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶65

BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI

¶66

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶67

1.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)

¶68

The Court made the following:

¶69

¶70

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶71

WRIT PETITION NO: 1703/201 fi

¶72

ORDER:

¶73

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with

¶74

the following prayer for;

¶75

.. .to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the fourth respondent vide proceedings No. 1231/2017-D dated 20/09/2017, as illegal, Arbitrary and contrary to Section 155D(2)(iv) of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Consequently direct the fifth respondent Society to continue the petitioner in its services in pursuance of the resolution of the general body dated 30/09/2015 and to pass..."

¶76

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Bobba Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petition may be disposed of, no further orders are required in this matter, since the relief has become infructuous.

¶77