Dismissed¶28

Dasari Nagamani v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Dec 2025WP/14115/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court (Amaravati), Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, 08.12.2025 - Writ Petition No.14115 of 2023 under Article 226 seeking mandamus to State of A.P. and East Godavari revenue authorities (District Collector, RDO, Tahsildar Gokavaram) to online and issue pattadar pass books and title deeds for Ac.9.87 cents in Survey Nos.416, 449 and 461, Tirumalayapalem village, Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, following unacted representation dt.8.12.2022; dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's request (B.Anna Purna Devi for petitioner; GP for Revenue for respondents); no costs; interlocutory applications closed; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed. ¶28

Dasari Nagamani Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.

¶28

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of Respondents 1 to 4 in not onlining and issuing the Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds for the petitioner's agricultural land admeasuring Ac.9.87 cents covered under Survey Nos.416, 449 and 461, Tirumalayapalem village, Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, basing on her representation dt.8.12.2022, is arbitrary, autocratic, illegal, ultra vires and against the principles of natural justice, and whether the respondents ought to be directed to issue pattadar pass books and title deeds by onlining the lands in the Revenue records of Government of Andhra Pradesh.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

Leave sought by Smt. B.Anna Purna Devi, learned counsel representing the petitioner's counsel on record, for withdrawal of the Writ Petition (endorsed on the bundle) is accorded by the Court.

¶27

Key takeaways

The present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, and there shall be no order as to costs. The substantive grievance regarding issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds was not adjudicated.ratio¶28
As a sequel to the dismissal as withdrawn, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

WRIT PETITION No.14115 of 2023 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao; 08.12.2025): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus declaring arbitrary, autocratic, illegal, ultra vires the action of Respondents 1 to 4 (State of Andhra Pradesh through Principal Secretary (Revenue); District Collector, RDO and Tahsildar, East Godavari) in not onlining and issuing Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds for the petitioner Dasari Nagamani's agricultural land admeasuring Ac.9.87 cents covered under Survey Nos.416, 449 and 461, Tirumalayapalem village, Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, notwithstanding her representation dt.8.12.2022, and directing issuance of the pattadar pass books and title deeds by onlining the lands in the Revenue records of Andhra Pradesh. On the date of the order, Smt. B.Anna Purna Devi, learned counsel representing the petitioner's counsel on record (Chandra Sekhar Ilapakurti), sought leave to withdraw the petition, with endorsement on the bundle; permission was accorded and the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications, if any, were ordered closed. No substantive issue was adjudicated.

¶1

[3330]

¶2

APHC010273532023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION No.14115 of 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

DASARI NAGAMANI, W/O SESHAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE-WIFE, R/O D.NO.79-18-13, OMKARA STREET, TILAK ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

¶14

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, GOKAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 herein in not onlining and issuing the Pattadar and title deeds to the Petitioner's agricultural land admeasuring Ac.9.87 cents covered under Survey Nos.416, 449 and 461 situated at Tirumalayapalem village of Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari District in the online Revenue Records of Andhra Pradesh basing on the representation of the Petitioner herein dt.8.12.2022 as arbitrary, autocractic, illegal, ultra vires and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently

¶18

¶19

direct the Respondents 1 to 4 herein to issue pattadar pass books and title deeds to the Petitioner's above mentioned agricultural lands by onlining them in Revenue records of Government of Andhra Pradesh in the interests of justice.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶23

The Court made the following:

¶24

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Smt. B.Anna Purna Devi, learned counsel represented on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner on record and sought leave of this Court for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition and the same is endorsed on the bundle also.

¶27

Permission is accorded.

¶28

Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶30

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶31

Date: 08.12.2025

¶32

Siva/CMK