B Umamaheswara Rao Vs the State of Ap

B UMAMAHESWARA RAO, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED-60 YEARS, OCC- WORKING AS PGT (MATHS) AT AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE (BOYS) SRIKHSHNAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶10

ALLU SATYA SUDHAKAR,, S/O A. RAMADAS (LATE), AGED-60 YEARS, OCCWORKING AS PHYSICAL DIRECTOR-I AT AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE (BOYS), SRIKHSHNAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶11

B. VIJAYA KUMARI, W/O LATE S. DURGA PRASADA RAO, AGED- 60 YEARS, OCC- WORKING AS TGT (HINDI) AT AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE, MEGHADRIGEDDA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶12

G. VARALAKSHMI, W/O V. KONDABABU, AGED-60 YEARS, OCC- WORKING AS HEALTH SUPERVISOR AT AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE, MEGHADRIGEDDA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶13

T. VEERAMANI, D/O T. VEERASWAMY, AGED- 60 YEARS, OCC-WORKING AS PHYSICAL DIRECTOR AT AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE, NELLIMARLA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

2

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (HR IV-FR AND LR), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶18

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶19

THE ANDHRA PRADESH SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MOKSHA SAI PLAZA, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR

¶20

THE PRINCIPAL, AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE (BOYS), SRIKRISHNAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶21

THE PRINCIPAL, AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE MEGHADRIGEDDA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶22

THE PRINCIPAL, AP SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE NELLIMARLA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶23

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶24

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking steps for enhancement of Petitioners Age of Superannuation from 60 to 62 years inspite of proposals sent by respondent society through his Letter vide Lr.Rc.No.Gen./1631910/2022, dt. 30.08.2022, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 31.01.2022 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in their respective posts in the colleges of respondents 4 to 6, till they attains age of superannuation of 62 years as per the G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 31.01.2022, by duly considering the proposals sent by the 3rd respondent dated 30.08.2022 and pass

¶25

3

¶26

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in their respective posts in the colleges of respondents 4 to 6, till they attains age of superannuation of 62 years as per the G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 31.01.2022 and by duly considering the proposals sent by the 3 respondent dated 30.08.2022, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass

¶28

IA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.12651 of 2024, dated 25-062024 in the interest of justice and pass

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶31

1.SRINIVAS AMBATI

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶33