Smt.Kathula Kanthamma v. Kathula Chandra Sekhar
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, FCA No.127 of 2009, decided 17.09.2025 (Battu Devanand and A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ.) - Family Court appeal under Section 19, Family Courts Act against decree/order dated 05.09.2008 in O.P.No.280 of 2006 of the Family Court, Visakhapatnam, between Kathula Kanthamma (appellant) and Kathula Chandra Sekhar (respondent); dismissed as infructuous on counsel's recorded statement regarding subsequent developments; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed. Search terms: infructuous appeal; Section 151 CPC; condonation of 79 days' delay (FCAMP 142/2009); attachment of retirement benefits, APSRTC Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem (FCAMP 260/2009); Rs.3,000 maintenance (FCAMP 261/2009); Gajuwaka; Visakhapatnam; O.P.No.280 of 2006.
What did the court decide?
On the recorded statement of the appellant's learned counsel that subsequent developments during the pendency of the appeal had rendered it infructuous, this Court dismissed the Family Court Appeal as infructuous.