Dismissed¶29

Peddu Sai Prasad, Visakhapatnam v. Peddu Vijaya Lakshmi, Visakhapatnam and Anr, Rep.by Pp., Hyd

Andhra Pradesh HC13 Aug 2025CRLRC/1783/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Peddu Sai Prasad v. Peddu Vijaya Lakshmi and State of Andhra Pradesh, Criminal Revision Case No.1783 of 2011 (decided 14.08.2025), High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao). Revision under S.397/401 Cr.P.C. against order dated 03.06.2011 in Crl.M.P.No.7438 of 2010 in D.V.C.No.1014 of 2007 (Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam) seeking to raise attachment of Rs.2,85,000/-. Background: suspension order dated 28-01-2011 in Crl.Rc.No.135 of 2011; judgment and decree in Crl.A.No.149 of 2008 (VIII Additional District and Sessions Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam). Result: revision dismissed for non-prosecution; interim orders vacated; miscellaneous applications closed. No ruling on merits; no precedent discussed.

What the court decided

Peddu Sai Prasad, Visakhapatnam Vs Peddu Vijaya Lakshmi, Visakhapatnam and Anr, Rep.by Pp., Hyd — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010372012011

¶2

[3369]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1783/2011

¶8

Between:

¶9

PEDDU SAI PRASAD, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O. POORNA CHANDRA RAO R/O. AYODYANAGAR COLONY, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

PEDDU VIJAYA LAKSHMI VISAKHAPATNAM AND ANR REP BY PP HYD, W/O. SAI PRASAD R/O. MIG -66, SECTOR - 5, MVP COLONY, VISAKHPATNAM

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD.

¶14

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶15

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto submit this memorandum of grounds of criminal revision case to this Hon'ble Court against the order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam in Crl.M.P.No.7438 of 2011 in D.V.C.No.1014 of 2007 dated 03-06-2011 after the suspension order of this Hon'ble Court dated 28-01-2011.

¶16

I.A.No: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP 2678 OF 2011

¶17

Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crl.MP.No.7483 of 2010 after the

¶18

suspension order of this Hon'ble Court dated 28-01-2011 in Crl.Rc.No.135 of 2011 against the judgment and decree in Crl.A.No. 149 of 2008 before the VIII Additional District and Sessions Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam including the order passed in Crl.MP.No.7438 of 2010 dated 03-06-2011 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Crl.Revision case.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.M LAKSHMI PRASAD

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶22

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

¶24

Criminal Revision Case No.1783 of 2011

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the orders dated 03.06.2011, passed in Crl.M.P.No.7438 of 2010 in D.V.C.No.1014 of 2007, on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, which is filed to raise the attachment for an amount of Rs.2,85,000/-.

¶27

None appeared for the petitioner/respondent.

¶28

Though the matter is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared on behalf of the petitioner/respondent. It appears that the petitioner/respondent is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this Court is unable to proceed without proper representation from both sides and deems it fit to dismiss this Criminal Revision Case.

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution.

¶30

Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J

¶33

Date: 14.08.2025 M K K

Peddu Sai Prasad, Visakhapatnam v. Peddu Vijaya Lakshmi, Visakhapatnam and Anr, Rep.by Pp., Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Peddu Sai Prasad, Visakhapatnam v. Peddu Vijaya Lakshmi, Visakhapatnam and Anr, Rep.by Pp., Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veeravilli Kamesh Naga Venkateswararao Vs the State of A.P.

The Agricultural Market Committee, Penugonda, Vs M/S Sri Venakteswara Rice Mill & Another

Smt. Puvvada Naga Kalpana, Visakhapatnam Vs Puvvada Srinivasa Rao, Bapatla, Guntur District and Another

Dr.B.Ramachandraiah Vs Dr.K.Nagi Reddy & 10 Others

Bonkuri Usha Vs Bonkuri Bala Venkateswarlu & the State of A.P.

A.K.Rekha Vs K.a.Sahadevan & the State of A.P.