Dismissed¶30

Ponakala Balarama Sundari, v. Kandimalla Nageswara Rao

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Dec 2025CMA/635/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC CMA 635/2025; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Ponakala Balarama Sundari and Others v. Kandimalla Nageswara Rao and Others; appeal by plaintiffs against rejection of application in I.A.No.1296 of 2023 pending O.S.No.157 of 2023 (III Additional District Court, Guntur); withdrawal of appeal on compromise/settlement; Rs.1,09,00,000 paid towards suit claim; dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; Ravi Nath Tilhari and Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, JJ.; dated 10.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications pending, if any, stand closed. ¶30

Ponakala Balarama Sundari, Vs Kandimalla Nageswara Rao — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010221812024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3524]

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 635/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

Ponakala Balarama Sundari, and Others

¶11

...APPELLANT(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

Kandimalla Nageswara Rao and Others

¶14

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant(S):

¶16

1.M CHALAPATI RAO

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶18

1.SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU

¶19

2.UPENDRA RAO MANUKONDA

¶20

The Court made the following:

¶21

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶22

This appeal was filed by the plaintiffs, being aggrieved by the interlocutory order dated 14.02.2024 in I.A.No.1296 of 2023 pending O.S.No.157 of 2023 on the file of III Additional District Court, Guntur. The plaintiffs’ application was rejected.

¶23

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties

¶25

have settled their dispute and an application for compromise has been filed in the suit. A memo to that effect has also been filed.

¶26

The said memo is being reproduced as under:-

¶27

< MEMO”

¶28

“ It is submitted that in view of the compromise recorded before

¶29

the trial court in O.S.no.157 of 2023 on the file of III-Addl. District Court, Guntur between, the appellants (plaintiffs) and respondents 1, 2, 5 and 6 (defendants 1,2, 5 & 6) under which an amount of Rs.1,09,00,000/- (one Crore Nine Lakhs only) was paid by the above respondents towards the suit claim to the appellants, they may be permitted to withdraw the above CMA.No.635 of 2025 in the interest of justice. Hence, the memo=.

¶30