Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S. Subrahmanyam, Vs Sri Irsal Qumar — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

Home
Andhra Pradesh HC
2025
S. Subrahmanyam, Vs Sri Irsal QumarS. Subrahmanyam, v. Sri Irsal Qumar

Dismissed¶52

S. Subrahmanyam, v. Sri Irsal Qumar

Andhra Pradesh HC19 Jun 2025CC/629/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Contempt Case (CC) No. 629 of 2025; document APHC010096252025; decided 20-06-2025 by Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao (single judge). Petitioner: S. Subrahmanyam. Respondents/contemnors: Sri Irsal Qumar (Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Hyderabad), Sri Mohit Singh (Chief Manager and Disciplinary Authority, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada), Sri C V N Bhaskar (Field General Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada). Counsel: Kavitha Gottipati (petitioner); K Lakshmi Narasimha (SC FOR AB) (respondents). Statute invoked: Sections 10 to 12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971; underlying orders dated 04-07-2023 in I.A No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 20167 of 2021. Outcome: withdrawal permitted; contempt case dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the contempt case was granted; the Contempt Case was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, were closed. ¶52

Why is it important?

Permission sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the contempt case was accorded. ¶51

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Leave to withdraw the contempt case was granted; the Contempt Case was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, were closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether leave should be granted to the petitioner to withdraw Contempt Case No. 629 of 2025.

Court's answer

Permission sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the contempt case was accorded.

Ratio / Principle

The Contempt Case was dismissed as withdrawn.

Key takeaways

No order was made as to costs; and, as a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were directed to stand closed.ratio¶53

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Case No. 629 of 2025, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao): S. Subrahmanyam sought leave to withdraw his contempt proceedings, instituted under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for alleged wilful disobedience of the orders dated 04-07-2023 in I.A No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 20167 of 2021, against Sri Irsal Qumar (Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Hyderabad) and Sri Mohit Singh and Sri C V N Bhaskar (Union Bank of India). Learned counsel sought leave to withdraw; permission was accorded and the Contempt Case was dismissed as withdrawn; there shall be no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were directed to stand closed. No substantive contempt finding was recorded.

A

APHC010096252025

Vil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 629 OF 2025

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein, the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents herein before this Court and punish them for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed by this Court in I.A No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 20167 of 2021 dated 04-07-2023.

Between:

S. Subrahmanyam, S/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged 63 years, R/o. 8/11, A.B. Road, Kanigiri, Prakasam District.

...PETITIONER/RESPODNENT N0.2

AND

Sri Irsal Qumar, Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cumLabour Court, Ministry of Labour and Employment Government of India, M-2 Block, Manoranjan Complex M.J. Road, Hyderabad -1

...1^* RESPONDENT

if / i

%

Sri Mohit Singh, Chief Manager and Disciplinary^Authority, Union Bank of India, Field General Manager's Office, Andhra Bank^{Building,R.R.} Appa Rao Street Vijayawada -1, A.P.

Sri C V N Bhaskar, Field General Manager, Union^BankofIndia, Field General Manager's Office, Andhra Bank Building, R.R. Appa Rao Street Vijayawada -1, A.P.

...2"'* & 3’^'* RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

Counsel for the Petitioner

: SRI KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

Counsel for the Respondents : SRI K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA (SC FOR AB)

The Court made the following ORDER :

APHC010096252025

.■v"

lU Vi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3330]

FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 629/2025

Between:

S. Subrahmanyam

...PETITIONER

AND

Sri Irsal Qumar and others

...CONTEMNOR(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA (SC FOR AB)

The Court made the following:

2

:/

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO. 629 OF 2025

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission^ofthisCourt for withdrawal of the contempt case.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any

shall stand closed.

SDI- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To.

Sri Irsal Qumar, Presiding Officer, The Central^{GovernmentIndustrial} Tribunal-cumLabour Court, Ministry of Labour and Employment Government of India, M-2 Block, Manoranjan Complex M.J. Road, Hyderabad -1

Sri Mohit Singh, Chief Manager and Disciplinary^Authority, Union Bank of India, Field General Manager's Office, Andhra Bank^{Building,R.R.} Appa Rao Street Vijayawada -1, A.P.

Sri C V N Bhaskar, Field General Manager, Union^BankofIndia, Field General Manager's Office, Andhra Bank Building, R.R. Appa Rao Street Vijayawada -1, A.P.

One CC to SRI. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI. K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA (SC FOR AB) Advocate [OPUC]

Three CD Copies

Pmg

TAC

HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025

ORDER CC NO. 629 OF 2025

( 2 5 SEP 2025 J
rrentS«ctio|X

DISMISSING THE CC AS WITHDRAWN

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether leave should be granted to the petitioner to withdraw Contempt Case No. 629 of 2025.¶50
The court held
Permission sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the contempt case was accorded.ratio¶51

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Contempt of Courts Act 197110 to 12¶8

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
Orders dated 04-07-2023 passed by this Court in I.A No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 20167 of 2021, alleged to have been wilfully disobeyed - the subject-matter of the contempt petition.¶8

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
S. Subrahmanyam¶10
Kavitha Gottipati
respondent
Sri Irsal Qumar¶13
K Lakshmi Narasimha (SC FOR AB)
respondent
Sri Mohit Singh¶17
K Lakshmi Narasimha (SC FOR AB)
respondent
Sri C V N Bhaskar¶18
K Lakshmi Narasimha (SC FOR AB)

Coram

AI extract

Tarlada Rajasekhar Raoauthor¶47

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Andhra Pradesh HC
Decided on: 19 Jun 2025 · June
Registered: 5 Mar 2025
Case no.: CC/629/2025
CNR: APHC010096252025
Topic: Contempt of Court
Bench: Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Case type: Contempt Case

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Gonabavi Jani Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh
8 May 2025
Gangireddy Ramana Reddy, Vs Sri. Kona Seshidhar, IAS
8 May 2025
Ankamma Talli Salivahana Co-Operative Society Ltd., Vs Pothineni Lakshmi
8 May 2025
M/S Rudra Agro Services Vs Sri Budithi Rajasekhar IAS
19 Jun 2025
P. Muralidhar Vs Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS
19 Jun 2025
Bh. Kiran Maheswari Vs Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS
19 Jun 2025

Cite this judgement

S. Subrahmanyam, v. Sri Irsal Qumar, CC/629/2025 (AP), decided on 19 June 2025.

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Contempt of Courts Act 197110 to 12

View all statutes

Procedural history1

Orders dated 04-07-2023 passed by this Court in I.A No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 20167 of 2021, alleged to have been wilfully disobeyed - the subject-matter of the contempt petition.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Parties & counsel