Dunnathala Narayana Vs G. Srinivasulu, IAS

¶1

APHC010079282025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

[3330]

¶4

TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 455/2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

DUNNATHALA NARAYANA, S/O. YALLAYYA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶9

OSURU SUBBARAYUDU,, S/O. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶10

AREM BUJJAMMA,, W/O. LAKSHMI NARASAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶11

DUNNATHALA YALLAREDDY,, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶12

AREM NARASIMHAREDDY,, S/O. PICHIREDDY.AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶13

DUNNATHALA NARASIMHAREDDY,, S/O. PENCHAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶14

GUNA LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O. PEDDA SIDDAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶15

RENDIA RAMIREDDY,, S/O. PAPIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶16

PIDUGU CHINNAPAREDDY,, S/O. KONDAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL,

¶17

2

¶18

KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶19

VALLUM SIDDAIAH,, S/O. GANGALAJERUVU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶20

PIDUGU TELLAYYAGARI RAMIREDDY,, S/O. CHINNA KONDIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶21

RENDLLA RAAMIREDDY,, S/O. PAPIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶22

MATLI OBAIAH,, S/O. OBAIAH. AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶23

AREM SUBBUNARASAREDDY,, S/O. GANGI REDDY. AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶24

AREM SUBBALAKSHAMMA,, W/O. PENCHALREDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶25

RENDIA SUBBAREDDY,, S/O. CHINNA SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶26

PATURI GANGAREDDY,, S/O. GANGIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶27

PIDUGU PADMA,, W/O. KONDAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶28

DUNNATHALA YALLAREDDY,, S/O. NARAYANAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶29

...PETITIONER(S)

¶30

AND

¶31

G SRINIVASULU IAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶32

3

¶33

SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-11,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT,

¶34

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶35

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 05.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.5722 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Lordships, and pass such

¶36

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent no. 3 in CC No. 455 of 2025 and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein, on the file of this Hon'ble High Court and pass

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶39

1.VALLEPU JAGADEESH

¶40

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶41

1.A JAYANTHI

¶42

4

¶43

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.455 of 2025

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

This Court, vide order dated 05.03.2024, disposed of the W.P.No.5722 of 2024, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to examine the representation dated 09.09.2022 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and communicate the same to the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. For non-compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed.

¶46

Precisely, representation is submitted for payment of Solatium on the enhanced compensation and interest amount on the Additional Market Value.

¶47

3 The 2^nd respondent-Special Deputy Collector (LA) (FAC), TGP Unit-II, Kadapa, vide proceedings dated 01.03.2025, disposed of the representation by relying on orders passed in W.P.Nos.23443 and 23447 of 2010, and suggested the petitioners to file Execution Petition before the competent civil Court.

¶48

Learned counsel for petitioners requested that a similar order be passed as in C.C.No.451 of 2025, wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court, while closing the contempt case, granted liberty to the petitioners therein to file an Execution Petition before the competent civil Court.

¶49