Disposed¶29

Mallela Satyanarayana v. Kousik

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2025CC/1776/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Contempt Case No. 1776 of 2021; Mallela Satyanarayana and Mallela Lakshmi v. Kousik (SP, Machilipatnam), B Srinivasulu (DSP, Nuzuvedu), Palivela Srinu (SHO, Mylavaram) and S Venkateswar (District Collector, Tirupati); Sections 10 to 12, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; willful disobedience of orders dated 28.07.2020 in W.P.No.12619 of 2020; compliance reported by petitioners' counsel (Sri A.M.Haneef for Sri Sridhar Tummalapudi); contempt closed without costs; Justice Ravi Cheemalapati; decided 18 September 2025.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed on recording counsel's submission that the orders in W.P.No.12619 of 2020 have been complied with; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed. ¶29

Mallela Satyanarayana Vs Kousik — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3332]

¶2

APHC010384392021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1776/2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

MALLELA SATYANARAYANA, , S/O. LATE VENKATESWARARAO, MALE, 28Y, OCC. COOLI, PONDUGALA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DT.

¶10

MALLELA LAKSHMI, W/O. RAMA RAO, FEMALE, 53Y, HOUSE WIFE, PONDUGALA VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DT.

¶11

...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

KOUSIK, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶14

B SRINIVASULU, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZUVEDU, KRISHNA DT.

¶15

PALIVELA SRINU, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DT.

¶16

S VENKATESWAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR,TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 4 IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27/09/24 IN CC NO-1773 OF 2021

¶17

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶18

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to summon the Respondent herein and punish him for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court made in

¶19

w.P.No. 12619 of 2020, dt. 28.7.2020 by Lordships Hon'ble Justice Smt. Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi, under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass such

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶21

1.SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI

¶22

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶23

1.V MAHESWAR REDDY

¶24

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.07.2020 passed in W.P.No.12619 of 2020.

¶28

Sri A.M.Haneef, learned counsel representing Sri Sridhar Thummalapudi, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that pursuant to filing of this Contempt, the respondent authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes of the petitioners, as such, the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, accordingly, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt.

¶29

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶32

Date: 18^th September, 2025 RKS

Mallela Satyanarayana v. Kousik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mallela Satyanarayana v. Kousik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.E.Sukrama Reddy, Kadapa Dist Vs the A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd, Hyd & 2 Others

M/S.Krebs Bio Chemicals Ltd., Nellore Vs Labour Court, Guntur Bypresiding Officer & Another

Dharakonda Mariyamma, E.G. Dist. Vs the Dist.Collector, Kakinada & 2 Others

K.Nagaraju Vs Shri Gopal Krishan Dwivedi

M.Papa Rao Visakhapatnam Vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director Hindustan S.Ltd. Viskha.

Gandham Subba Rao Vs Sri Budithi Rajasekhar IAS