Kuntla Lalitha Alias Lalithamma Vs Anil Kumar Singhal, Ias(Discharged)

KUNTLA LALITHA ALIAS LALITHAMMA, W/O KUNTLA CHALAPATHI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE D.NO.275/A, ASHOK NAGAR, HOUSING BOARD COLONY ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH (PRESENTLY, R/O 2548, E BLOCK, 13TH MAIN 9TH CROSS, SAHAKAR NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 092)

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL IASDISCHARGED, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED - MAJOR, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 86 URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522 238. R 1 IS DISCHARGED FROM THE CONTEMPT CASE AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 25/07/25, VIDE I.A NO-1/25 IN CC NO-1067/2025

¶14

SRI KUMAR VISHWAJEET L P S, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED - MAJOR, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI AMARAVAHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH-522 238.

¶15

SRI B BALASWAMI, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED - MAJOR, OCC COMMISSIONER, ANANTHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶16

2

¶17

SRI V SREENIVASA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED - MAJOR, OCC DISTRICT FIRE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANDRHA PRADESH

¶18

SMT SIREEESHA, W/O NOT KNOWN S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED - MAJOR, OCC TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDRHA PRADESH

¶19

SMT P V ADEMMA, W/O P V RAMA MOHAN CHOWDARY AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO.5-75, P.V.C COLONY, BELLARY ROAD ANANTHAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADES

¶20

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶21

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents/contemnors for their willful disobedience and defiance to the orders dated 20-02-2025 dated passed in W.P No.4279 of 2025, and pass such

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to discharge this Respondent No.1 in CC No.1067 of 2025 in W.P.No.4279 of 2025 as Respondent No.1 and may pass

¶24

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead H). Sri S.Vijaya Kumar S/o not known. Aged Major, Occ: Revenue Officer, O/o the Commissioner, Ananthapur Municipal Corporation, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh, 2) Sri G Raja Sekhar S/o not known. Aged - Major, Occ: Superintending Engineer, O/o the Commissioner, Ananthapur Municipal Corporation, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh, and 3) Sri T.Chandra Sekhar S/o not known, Aged - Major, Occ: Deputy Executive APSDCL,Engineer, Operations Sub-Division Town-I, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapur Town & District, Andhra Pradesh’, as Respondent Nos.7 to 9 in

¶26

3

¶27

C.C No. 1067 of 2025 in W.P No.4279 of 2025, and in all miscellaneous applications therein, and to pass

¶28

IA NO: 3 OF 2025

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with my presence before this Hon'ble Court on 24-102025 in CC.No: 1067 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass

¶30

IA NO: 4 OF 2025

¶31

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Recall the Bailable Warrant of Arrest issued against me in CC 1067 of 2025 on 30.10.2025

¶32

IA NO: 5 OF 2025

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to re-call the bailable warrant of arrest issued on 30-10-2025 in CC No: 1067/2025 and pass

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶35

1.LEO LAW ASSOCIATES LLP

¶36

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶37

1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

¶38

2.RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI

¶39

3.A JAYANTHI

¶40

4

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER:

¶42

This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No.4279 of 2025 on 07.02.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order:

¶43

<In view of the same, instead of keeping the writ petition pending, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to proceed further in pursuance of the Confirmation Order dated 12.12.2024 as against the 6th respondent, by duly conducting an enquiry in accordance with law. The respondent authorities are also directed to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioner on 16.12.2024, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.=

¶44

The respondent Nos.5 and 3 have filed detailed counters. The respondent No.3, in his counter, stated that in pursuance of the interim orders passed by this Court on 20.02.2025, a charge sheet was filed against the unofficial respondents, and the Office has also initiated the following action on the said construction as under:

¶45

a) An occupancy certificate has not been issued by this office for the said construction till date.

¶46

b) The Revenue Officer and Superintending Engineer of this office were directed not to sanction any water connection, extend municipal facilities, or process any further transactions related to assessments of the said construction until disposal of C.C.190 of 2025 by the Hon’ble High Court.

¶47

c) A communication letter was addressed to the Deputy Executive Engineer, Operation Sub-Division Town-1, APSPDCL, Ananthapuramu, vide Roc. No. 733/2025/G2 dated 24.07.2025, seeking an explanation on how the electricity connection was released to the said premises without obtaining prior confirmation of Occupancy Status from this office.

¶48

5

¶49

d) An endorsement vide Roc. No. 733/2025/G2 dated 01.08.2025 was issued to Smt. P.V. Ademma, directing stoppage of all further construction activities at the subject premises, as the matter is sub-judice before the Hon’ble High Court.

¶50

The 5^th respondent has also filed a counter-affidavit, duly stating that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, this office has initiated action on the said construction, which stands as Cellar + G + 2 upper floors building in deviation to the sanctioned plan vide BA No. 1001/0080/B/ATP/CUTROA/2023 dated 08.06.2023, with respect to setbacks, by filing a charge sheet in the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ananthapuramu, vide C.C. No.190 of 2025, which is under prosecution.

¶51

The said facts would establish that, in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, the respondent Nos.3 and 5 have initiated action by filing a charge sheet vide C.C.No.190 of 2025, on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ananthapuramu, which is under prosecution. Further, no occupancy certificate has been issued for the said construction till date. The Revenue Officer and Superintending Engineer have been directed not to sanction any water connection, extend municipal facilities, or process any further transactions relating to the said construction until disposal of Calendar Case No.190 of 2025 before the Court below. An endorsement was also issued vide Roc. No. 733/2025/G2 dated 24.07.2025 in favour of the unofficial respondent, directing stoppage of all further construction activities at the said

¶52

6

¶53

premises, as the matter is pending before the learned Additional Judicial First

¶54

Class Magistrate, Ananthapuramu.

¶55