Petitioners challenged an administrative order allowing a mineral water plant in their village, claiming violation of fundamental rights regarding festival sites. The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on procedural grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VX‘
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
1
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8813 OF 2020
Between;
about 68 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Door No.3/103-A Dhannavada, H/o. VaddiralaVillage, Mylavaram Mandal, Y.S.R District.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
J
.
U V*- % -3
Note; Respondent R6 Cause Title is Amended as per CourtOrder dated: 17/06/2020 in lA No 2/2020
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 6 in allowing the respondent No.7 in establishing 'RO MINERAL WATER PLANT along with Shed in the place which is being used by petitioners and other Villagers for celebrating petitioners religious festivals i.e., Peddamma Devatha Jatha, Moulaliswamy Jathara, Peerla Panduga etc., eventhough, the sufficient vacant and suitable place is
available in the Village as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on them and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioners under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to 6 not to allow the respondent No.7 'RO mineral water plant alonwith Shed in the place which is being used by petitioners and petiotners Villagers for celebrating their religious festivals i. e., Peddamma Devatha Jatha, Moulaliswamy Jathara, Peerla Panduga etc.
lA NO: 2 OF ?n7n
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To amend the respondent No 6 as Vaddirala Gram Panchayth, Vaddirala Village, Mylavaram Mandal, YSR District rep by its Panchyath Secretary.
lA NO: 1 OF 7070
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the proceedings Procgs. DB/TO/APMDC/W.O./2019, dated 28.12.2019 issued by the respondent No.3, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. V R REDDY KOWURI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents : SRI. G. VENKATA REDDY (SC)
The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.8813 OF 2020
Alle Prabha Nagi Reddy, W/o Alle Bala Nagir Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Occ:Ex-Mandal Parishad President, R/o.D.No.3-82, Dhannavada, H/o Vaddirala Village, Mylavara Mandal, YSR District and four others. ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Panch'ayath Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District and five others.
... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri V.R.Reddy Kowuri Counsel for respondents : GP for Panchayat Raj and Sri G.Venkata Reddy, Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat
ORDER
Sri A.Manjunathan, .learned counsel representing Sri V.R.Reddy Kowuri, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause does not survive in the writ petition and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitionsshall
stand closed.
I
/
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to SRI. V R Reddy Kovvuri Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CCS to Gp For Panchayat Raj Rural Dev .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- Two CD Copies
YJ
•V
/
HIGH COURT > DATED:02/02/2024 'A ■■A * > ' ' ■ iv s . MA: A' ^ ■>.
ORDER WP.No.8813 of 2020
o^'"' O:'-
/:/rj
^ ^ 2021, 'i'"
*'"-a
•■ '^'renf tea-ffoTjg
DISMISSING THE W.P, AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Alle Prabha Nagi Reddy and four others
State of Andhra Pradesh and five others
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
