Writ petition alleging unauthorised G+4 construction without permission at Kanipakam Village. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2173fi OF 9non
Between:
T. Ravikumar, Father Name T. Thulasinadan Residing at Kanipakam Village and post, Irala Mandal, Chittoor.
...Petitioner
AND
Flyover, Beside Little Village Restaurant, Chinnakakani, Mangalagiri Guntur-522503.
Bank Employee, Residing at Theru Street^ Kanipakam Village and Post,
Irala Mandal, Chittoor District- 517131.
T Chittoof District- 517’131
i i
...Respondents
' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 3, 4 and 6 to demolish the Unauthorized construction of G+4 building made by Respondents7and8at Kanipakam Village without having permission and also violation of the proceedings of the Panchayath Secretary.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 and 4 to take appropriate action on Unauthorized constructed of G+4 building made by Respondents7&8at Kanipakam Village without having permission, which is trying to let out the same for the commercial purpose. Otherwise it is not possible to implement the order passed by the 6th respondent and direct the respondents 3 and 4 to seal and lock the premises of unauthorized construction of G+4 building, as an interim order pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner
: Sri S.Sarath Kumar
Counsel for respondent No.1 & 4 : GP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.3 : GP for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 5 : GP for MunicipalAdministration Counsel for respondent No.6 : Sri G.Venkata Reddy
Standing Counsel
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.21735 OF 2020
Between:
T.Ravi Kumar S/o T.Thulasinadam, Hindu, aged about 30 years, Advocate, Residing at Kanipakam Village and Post, Irla Mandal, Chittoor.
... Petitioner
And
The State of Andhr Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretaiy, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh and seven others.
... Respondents
•i.y'
Counsel for the petitioner Sri S.Sarath Kumar Counsel for respondent No.l 85 4 GP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent No.3 GP for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.2 85 5 GP for Municipal Administration
Counsel for respondent No.6
Sri G.Venkata Reddy Standing Counsel
ORDER
Sri S.Sarath Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition ISi dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall
Stand closed.
Sd/- E.KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
/^^fKTION OFFICER
of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
CVSS
V . V.
HIGH COURT
dated :02/02/2024
anoT?
m
g 31JUL 202^ ^
. Current Section . ^
^^£^spatcv^5^^
ORDER
WP.No.21735of2020
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
T. Ravi Kumar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
M. Medhavi alias Surendra Kumar
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
