The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 8498 of 2016 and the accompanying Section 151 application as infructuous in a criminal investigation matter.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGhXOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAo'§^ WRIT PETITION NO: 8498 OF 201fi ^
Between:
P.Chandrasekhar Reddy, S/o. Late Laxmanrao Reddy, aged 48 years R/o. H.No.39-33-14/8, M.I.G.-319, Madavdhara, Visakhapatnam,A.P.
...Petitioner/s
AND
...Respondent/s
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly oneinthenatureofwrit of MANDAMUS declare the action of the respondents police in not conducting investigation in Cr.No.66/2015, dated:16.10.2015 on the file of 3rd Respondent PS as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C. and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to take necessary action in Cr.No.66/2015 against the accused in accordance with law ^
LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 10763 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the investigation against the accused in Cr.No.66/2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition -
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. P R K Amerandra Kumar
Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 3; GP for HOIVLE(AP)
The Court made the following:
APHC010030352016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3310] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 8498/2016
Between:
P.Chandrasekhar Reddy,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
l.P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S): l.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following order:
Mr.P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petitiondoesnot survive and it has become infructuous, as such, no further orders are required in this matter.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending.
shall stands closed.
Sd/- V. SAVITHRI GOWRI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
SAM
HIGH COURT
DATED;1 4/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.8498 of 2016
m
X 12 DEC 202'! °
AO
Currant Section
dismissing this COSTS
WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking mandatory process to direct police investigation survives when deemed infructuous.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Chandrasekhar Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City
Station House Officer, Airport Police Station
G. Pydiraju
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
