Dismissed

Sri Ramadasu Trimurthulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Jul 2024WP/7710/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court judge permitted withdrawal of a writ petition challenging non-promotion of an Assistant Manager to Manager in a cooperative bank, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Sri Ramadasu Trimurthulu Vs The State of… — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY. THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 7710 OF 2024

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri Ramadasu Trimurthulu, S/o. Appa Rao, Age 49 years, Occ Assistant Manager The District cooperative Central Bank Limited No 2351, Nagamalli Thota.Kakinada.KakinadaDistrict.

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Chief Secretary to Government Cooperative Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur Distract, A.P

¶11

The District cooperative Central Bank Limited. No. 2351, Nagamalli Thota, Kakinada, Kakinada District. Represented by^{itsChiefExecutive} Officer.

¶12

The District cooperative Central Bank Limited.No.2351, Nagamalli Thota, Kakinada, Kakinada District. Represented by its Chair person/Person In charge committee

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or orders direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not promoting the petitioner to the post of Manager in-spite of having qualification, seniority^{andtodeclarethesame} as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to the service regulations of the 2nd respondent bank and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner from the post of Assistant Manager

¶15

¶16

to the Post of Manger in the 2nd respondent Bank duly taking into consideration the qualification, seniority

¶17

.'1

¶18

; lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶19

"X .. A . ' Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner from the post of Assistant Manager to the Post of Manger in the 2nd respondent Bank duly taking into consideration the qualification, seniority and as per the service regulations, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PILLI SUNDEEP

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SERVICES II

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents No.2 and 3: SC FOR DCCB SRI SRINIVAS BASAVA

¶23

The Court made the following: Order

¶24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.771Q OF ?n?d

¶26

Between:

¶27

Sri Ramadasu Tirmurthulu, S/o. Appa Rao, age 49 years, Occ- Assistant Manager, The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, No 2351, Nagamalli Thota, Kakinada, Kakinada District.

¶28

... Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Chief Secretary to Government, Cooperative Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, A.P. and two others.

¶29

... Respondents

¶30

Counsel for the petitioner Sri Pilli Sundeep Counsel for respondents GP for Services - II Sri Srinivas Basava

¶31

ORDER

¶32

Sri Pilli Sundeep, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition.

¶33

Permission is accorded.

¶34

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. No order as to costs.

¶35

¶36

in this case, shall if any pending Miscellaneous petitions

¶37

stand closed.

¶38

//true copy//

¶39

Sd/- K LAKSHMl PAVANl assistant registrar ^'^"ection officer

¶40

To,

¶41

SUNDEEP Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

One CC to SRI PIELl basava sc for DCCB [OPUCl CC to SRI SRINIVASA

¶43

One Court of Andhra Pradesh GP FOR SERVICES II, High

¶44

3 Two CCs to [OUT]

¶45

Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.7710 of 2024

W3: /UOl/
U'5 'i;. a:
. ^ s ■oer 2:/, m,
★
i-ra:

¶52

DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Sri Ramadasu Trimurthulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ramadasu Trimurthulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Narasimham Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Thadikamalla Tara Vs the State of Ap

T Ramesh Kumar Reddy Vs the State of Ap

Amballa Srinivasa Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

D.Yesanna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dasari Nageswara Rao Vs The Chief General Manager