Petitioner sought writ to set aside removal order due to alleged violation of natural justice regarding political campaign participation. Petitioner withdrew the petition while seeking a liberty to approach appropriate authority.
Permission withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate authority. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
\j
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13699 OF 2024
Between:
Dasari Nageswara Rao, S/o.D.Venkat Rao, aged 49 years Occ Shift Operator (removed) R/o.Peruru, Amalapuram Mandal Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District Andhra Pradesh
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings in Letter No.EE/0/AMP/JAO/ AD M/S A2/D. No.789/2024 dt.27-04- 2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent directing the 4th Respondent to terminate petitioner services as Shift Operator on the alleged ground
m
that he campaign with political party during general election and consequential order of removal dt.27-04-2024 passed by the 4th respondent without any notice and opportunity of hearing as highly illegal, violative of principles of natural justice besides unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the proceedings dt.27-04-2024 passed by the respondents 3 and 4 and restore petitioner s services as shift operator with all consequential benefit.
lA NO: 1 OF 2()7d
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings No.EE/0/AMP/JAO/ ADM/SA2/D.NO.789/2024 dt.27-04-2024 issued by the 3rd Respondent and the consequential order of removal from service dt.27-04-2024 passed by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. YASWANTH GADE
Counsel for Respondent No.5: ENERGY
The Court made the following:
W
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.13699 of 2024
Dasari Nageswara Rao, S/o D. Venkat Rao, aged 49 years, Occ: Shift Operator (removed), R/o Peruru, Amalapuram Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh.
... Petitioner Versus The Chief General Manager O & CS, Corporate Office, APEPDCL, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P. ... Respondents, Counsel for the petitioner ; Sri G. Yaswanth Counsel for respondents GP for Services -I
:: ORDER::
Sri T. Sai Surya, learned advocate, representing Sri G. Yaswanth, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authority.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, ■ this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No order as tocosts.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
K il A
‘V
HIGH COURT SRS,J DATED:08/07/2024
ORDER WP.No.13699 of 2024
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dasari Nageswara Rao
The Chief General Manager, O and CS, Corporate Office APEPDCL
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
