Ch v. Rao v the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause no longer survived; no costs, pending applications closed.
What did the court decide?
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
APHC010016372019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 711/2019
Between:
Ch.Venugopal Rao
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of AP and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ch. Venugopal Rao
- respondent
The State of AP and Others
Coram
K Manmadha Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/711/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sri Sai Sands, Rep. by its Managing Partner Vs State of Andhra Pradesh
Poosarla Ramana, Visakhapatnam Dist.,a.P. Vs the State of a.P.,Mines,Amaravathi,a.P.,and 2 Otrs.
M/s. Vision Stone Crusher, Rep.by its.Proprietor. Vs The Director of Mines and Geology
Kokkiligadda Jagan Mohan Rao, Vs the State of Ap and 5 Others