The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a public auction of temple lands as infructuous, based on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives, without recording further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Js>'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATUy
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY v./ //
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR (ft
PRESENT ^
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K IVIANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1876^OF 2009
Between:
...PETrflONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in conducting public auction of the lands belonging to the petitioners admeasuring an extent of Ac. 6.48 cents in RS No. 92 Ammepalli Village, Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and in violation of the provisions of A.P. Charitable Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 and Rules made thereunder and violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and to set aside the same.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2009rWVMP. NO: 3623 OF 2009)
Between:
Manager, Sri Veereswara Swamy, Bahvanarayana Swamy, Sitaramaswamy Vari Temple, Pattisam Village, Pollavaram Mandal, W.G. District
...Petitioner/5*^ Respondent
AND
Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt 8-9-2009 inWPNo. 18766of2009.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 24532 OF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to evict the petitioners from the lands situated in Sy.No. 92 admeasuring an extentofAc.6.48centsof Ammepalli Village, Nidadavolu Mandal, West GodavariDistrict by staying
all other proceedings in pursuance of auction notification dated 8-8-2009 issued by the respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS -- Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) The Court made the following: None
APHC010211392009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18766/2009
Between:
Alapati Sathyanarayana and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND
The Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR)
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following order:
Mr.G.Venkata Sailendra, learned counsel representing Mr.G.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the writ petition doesnotsurvive •f and it has become infructuous, as such, no furtherorders are required iri.this matter.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,shall
/
stands closed. SD/- m.prabhakara rao ASSISTANT) REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEO PFfCER
To,
sssr
COURT
// '4
t
{* • f i I
4*
%
DATED;02/07/2024
ORDER
ANOSSSsj
*> ^ ^
2 f 6 JAN 2'':) m
to.
^ . Current Section * ^
WP.No.18766 of 2009
dismissing the W.P as INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS.
Alapati Sathyanarayana and Others
The Commissioner and Others
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
