Writ petition sought a mandamus directing investigation and charge sheet filing in F.I.R. No. 449/2013 and CBI investigation. Counsel for the petitioner submitted the cause no longer survived. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
^
FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5613 OF 2015
Between:
Yelugula Chandra Sekhar S/o Late Siva Prasada Rao System Operator, S.K.S. Microsoft, Visakhapatnam, RJo Bobbin, Vizianagaram District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of.the Constitution of India praytng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not filing the charge sheet and conducting investigation in F.I.R.No.449/2013 dated 17/08/2013 by the Saifabad Police and consequentially direct the Director, C.B.I., Hyderabad to investigate the same in the interest of justice
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 7471 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be ' : pleased to direct the C.B.I. to investigate the F.I.R. No. 449 of 2013 dated 17/08/2013, Saifabad Police, Hyderabad and file charge sheet in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KANAKARAJU REPRESENTING SRI. K SUBRAHMANYAM
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following Order:
THE HON^BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.5613 of 2015
ORDER:-
Mr.Kanakaraju, learned counsel representing
Mr.K.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the cause in the present Writ Petitiondoes
not survive, and it has become infructuous.
appearing for the respondents is present.
is 3. •Recording,.the aboveysubmission, the Writ Petition V.’ -rf' /■ V, dismissed--,as ;Infructuo.us.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- B. PRASADA RAO assistant registrar
To,
//TRUE COPY//
CA^ /sectionOFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5613 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking a direction for charge sheet filing and CBI investigation in F.I.R. No. 449/2013 survived for adjudication?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yelugula Chandra Sekhar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh
The Director General of Police, Inspector General of Police
The A.R. Constable, P.C.No.1824
The Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
