Writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging a permission to construct apartments and seeking interim stay ordered under Section 151 CPC. Dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or submit representations on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:;AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6384 OF 2013
Between:
Rapeti Nookaraju, S/o Simhachalam Hindu, aged about 65 years R/o Nidhanam Veedhi Gavarapalem, Anakapalli Visakhapatnam. Rep. by its MOU Holder Smt. Y. Anuradha W/o Sri Y.V.Rao, Plot No. G-2,BlueLotusRoad No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmay be pleased to issue a appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaringtheactionof be directed in not cancelling all the necessary the Respondents may permissions granted by the 1st Respondent for constructionofApartments on the above schedule property which is arbitrary, unjustmalafideand against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the procedure contemplated under Law and also in violation of Constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interferewithmypeaceful possession and enjoyment of the above schedule property to an extent of 430 Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 40/2 at Peda Waltair, Visakhapatnam
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 7978 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe interim direction directing the respondents to stop all pleased to pass an illegal constructions made by the 3rd and 4th respondents in the above said property of 430 sq. yards in Sy.No.40/2 at Peda Waltair, Visakhapatnam
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V PREETI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents; K MADHAVA REDDY (SC)
Counsel for the Respondents; THE GP FOR REVENUE (STAMPSAND
REGISTRATION)
The Court made the following; ORDER
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.6384 of 2013
Rapeti Nookaraju, S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, aged about 65 years, R/o Nidhanam Veedhi, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its MOU Holder, Smt. Y. Anuradha, W/o Sri Y.V. Rao, Plot No.G-2, Blue Lotus Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
... Petitioner
Versus
Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam and three others.
Respondents
: Sri V. Pretthi Reddy, learned counsel
Counsel for the petitioner
: Sri K. Madhava Reddy, learned standing counsel and learned GP for Stamps and Registration
Counsel for respondents
1 )
:: ORDER
This writ petition is of the year, 2013. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 31.01.2024, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2
Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitionereitherin the forenoon or in the afternoon. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shall stand dismissed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// S( SEcflOwtoFFICER
To
- One CC to SRI. V PREETI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
- One CC to SRI. K MADHAVA REDDY, Standing Counsel. [OPUC]
- Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT
- Three CD Copies
YJ(MBT)
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.6384 of 2013
DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON-PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
s.
r
X<5. r^ ^4 cco cr'im ,
^ . Ctirren; Ejection
Rapeti Nookaraju
Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
Stamps & Registration Department (Rep. by Sub-Registrar)
Mande Venkateswara Rao
Ippili Panduranga Rao
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
