Yasam Venkata Ramana v. State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court admitted a writ petition challenging a merit list for a Senior Treatment Supervisor post. During pendency, the petitioner was appointed as a Lab Technician. The court held no further orders were needed and closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5943 OF 2021
Between:
Yasam Venkata Ramana, S/o Venkataiah, aged 34 years Occ: Un-employee, R/o Shaj Nagar. Kongaliveedu Road, Giddaluru Prakasam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
- The District Collector/Chairman District Health and Family Welfare Society (RNTCP), Ongole, Prakasam District.
- The District Medical and Health Officer/Member,DistrictHealthand Family Welfare Society (RNTCP), Prakasam District, Ongole.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether successive orders are required from a petitioner who was appointed to a different post during the pendency of the writ petition.
Whether the high court should close the writ petition upon the submission that no further orders are required.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Yasam Venkata Ramana
- respondent
State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram
K Manmadha Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/5943/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court