Writ petition challenging an auction notice and seeking tenancy rights was dismissed as infructuous. The court accepted the counsel's submission that the cause did not survive due to pending related proceedings.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY^" TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR • PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 37471 OF 2012
Be'tween:
Garapati Veera Raghavulu, S/o late Gopala Rao, Aged about 64 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o Bhimadole village. West GodavariDistrict.
...Petitioner »
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS (a) declaring the action ofythe 2nd respondent in issuing impugned auction notice dated 23.11.2012 in proposing to conduct auction on 6.12.2t5l2 in respect of the petition schedule land admeasuring Ac.4-13 cents situated in R.S. No 280/1 of M.
Nagulapalli village, West Godavari District thoughtheW.P. No. 9688 of 2008 filed by the petitioner is pending, seeking lease hold rights to the petitioner over the petition schedule land and the impugned auction notice is illegal, arbitrary and the same is liable to be set aside; and (b) consequently direct the respondents that the petitioner is entitled to continue as tenant over the petition schedule land admeasuring Ac.4-13 cents situated in R.S. No. 280/1 of M. Nagulapalli village. West Godavari District by taking into consideration of the fact that the petitione r IS cultivating tenant on the petition schedule land to the 2"^^ respondent temple right from 1965 onwards and also the petitioner has developed the land and made it fit for cultivation and the petitioner comes under the act
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 47555 OF 2012t
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned Notice dated 23.11.2012 in proposing to conduct auction on 06.12.2012 in respect of petition schedule land admeasuringAc.4-13cents of M. Nagulapalli village. West Godavari District
I.A, NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 22897 OF 2013t
Between;
The Executive Officer, Sri Venkateswara and Anjaneyaswamy Temple Bhimadole Village and Mandal, West Godavari District
...Vacate Petitioner/R2
AND
...Respondent/Writ Petitioner
...Respondents/Respondents
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the 2'^'^ respondent temple to finalize the auction which was held on 05.06.2013
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 &4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRI. V T M PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010140812012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
SATURDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
1 .
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 37471/2012
V \
Between:
Garapati Veera Raghavulu
...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.VTM PRASAD
2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following Order:
Mr.K.Satyanarayana Murthy, learned counsel for thepetitioner submits
that the cause in the present writ petition does notsurvive,and it has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous.
V
li'i
/
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
csb
HIGH COURT
csb
DATED:20/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.37471 of 2012
(P
, S 0 8 JAN 2D25 m
Co.
^ Current Section . ■i'j
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Garapati Veera Raghavulu
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
