Writ petition seeking family pension and terminal benefits payable to the petitioner's late husband, a retired Mandal Educational Officer. Counsel submitted the cause no longer survives; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5480 OF 2020
Between;
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the family pension and other terminal benefits to the petitioner, payable to her late husband, who retired as Mandal Educational Officer , as illegal arbitrary violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of
%
Y
India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the family pension and other benefits to the petitioner payable to herlatehusband
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith pay the family pension and other terminal benefits to the petitioner, payable to her late husband, who retired as Mandal Educational Officer, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR
Counsel for the Respondents Nos.1 & 5: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) Counsel for the Respondents Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondents No.4 : SRI J. SUMATHI (SC FOR MPDO)
The Court made the following ORDER :
4
0
APHC010090992020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5480/2020
Between:
T Vijayaiakshmi
...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KOCHIR1 RAJASHEKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.KochiriRajaSekhar,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thecauseinthepresentwrit
petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
dismissed as 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
/
Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
PMT
DB MANGA
0
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5480 Of 2020
's 19 FEB 2025 g
& Cotrwl
X£oesPATCVV!5-"
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
T. Vijayalakshmi
State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, Chittoor District
The District Educational Officer, Chittoor District
The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Yerpedu Mandal
The Principal Accountant General (A&E), Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
