Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No.46 of 2016 registered under IPC and community certificate provisions alleging offences relating to a community certificate. With no representation on multiple dates, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL . ' I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12239 OF 2016 ,
Between:
Vizianagaram District
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to F.I.R.No.46, dated 08-03-2016 registering the case as Crime No.46 under Sec.417, 465, 460, 468, 471 of IPC and Sec.12 of AP (SC', ST and BCs) Regulation of
4 issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 and Rules, 1997, registered in Salur Town Police Station, Salur, Vizianagaram District by respondents 1 and 2, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law, one without jurisdiction and the petitioners herein pray that the same may be quashed.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP.No.15341/2016inWP.No.12239 of 2016 dt.13-04-2016.
lA NO: 3 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the writ petition as early for final disposal of the same in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 9 days in representing the abovecaseinWP.SRNo.8 of 2018.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 15341 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY the F.I.R.No.46, dated 08.03.2016 registered inSalurTown Police Station, Salur, Vizianagaram District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the documents as Additional material Papers in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 2472 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13-04-2016 in W.P.M.P. No. 15341/ 2016 in W.P. No. 12239 of 2016.
Counsel for the Petitioner’s : SRI. M VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 6: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : GP FOR REVENUE (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 : SRI. J SATYA PRASAD,Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010826452016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12239/2016
Between:
Dr. P.v.p.sai Arun, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Station House Officer and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.M VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondents):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3.6762/J SATYA PRASAD
The Court made the following Order:
None appeared for the petitioners. On the earlier occasionsalsoi.e.,on 14.03.2024 & 28.03.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So, it appears that the petitioners arenotevincinganyinterestto prosecute their writ petition.
No 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. order as to costs.
2
i ! /
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
KASIRAO achari ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SE Qtl&OFFICER
GTS
WP DB
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.12239 of 2016
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dr. P.V.P. Sai Arun
Dr. P.V. Sai Santosh Kiran
The Station House Officer, Salur Town PS
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Salur Town PS
The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District
State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
