Disposed

P Sanjay v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Mar 2024WP/4394/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of a Writ Petition and a miscellaneous petition under Section 151 CPC filed by P Sanjay seeking directions to register a crime committed by Sharmasvali and S.M. Shameer. The court noted that the police deemed the dispute civil in nature and dismissed the petitions without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and miscellaneous petition were closed; the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate legal remedies.

P Sanjay Vs the State of Ap — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

►

¶2

\N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 4394 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

P Sanjay, S/o. Dada Rao, aged about 50 years, Occ:^{Business,D/o.} 23/11, Old town, Anantapur Dist.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal^{Secretary,Home} Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur^District.

¶12

The Superintend of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapur.

¶13

The Station House Officer, Uravakonda, Anantapur^District.

¶14

Sharmasvali, S/o. Abdul Reham, Aged 43 Years,

¶15

S.M. Shameer, S/o. M Sharmasvali, aged 16 Years,

¶16

(Respondents 4 and 5 are residing at Uravakonda Village^andMandal Anantapur Dist.)

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 5^^ respondent for not registering the crime against the respondents 4 and 5 which is Illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently direct the 3 rd respondent to Register the Crime of the petitioner

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to register the crime against the 4‘^ and 5 th respondent by the petitioner

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. M Karibasaiah

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 3: GP for HOME (AP)

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 4 & 5: ---

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.4394 of 2024

¶27

ORDER:-

¶28

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the

¶29

Constitution of India seeking the following relief.

¶30

ii...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 5^^ respondent for not registering the crime against the respondents 4 and 5 which is Illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of the natural justice and consequently direct the 3'"'^ respondent to register the Crime of the petitioner and pass”

¶31

Heard both sides. 3. At the time of hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that basing on a report, police called the petitioner and unofficial respondents for the purpose of inquiry and on the basis^of inquiry, the respondent/police came to conclusion that^the disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents appear to be predominantly civil in nature and that^the police advised both the parties to work out their remedies in accordance with law and refused to register the^case.

¶32

^ ■

¶33

¶34

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is

¶35

closed. The petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to the

¶36

remedies available to him under law.

¶37

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ

¶38

Petition, shall stand closed.

¶39

//TRUE COPY//

¶40

SD/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

¶41

To,

¶42

One CC to Sri. M Karibasaiah Advocate [OPUC]

¶43

Two CCs to GP for HOME (AP) .High Court Of Andhra^{Pradesh.[OUT]}

¶44

Three CD Copies

SAM

r '

HIGH COURT

DATED:05/03/2024

ORDER

WP.No.4394 of 2024

CLOSING THIS WP WITHOUT COSTS

P Sanjay v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P Sanjay v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunkara Veera Venkata Naga Suresh Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Yarlagadda Krishna Chandu Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Penemetsa Agastya Maruti Varma Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Katragadda Vijay Krishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mr Dharani Babu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Veera Venkata Satya Rao Sridharala Vs the State of Ap