The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear personally or through counsel despite the matter being posted for dismissal, leading to the closure of the petition without costs.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 42433 OF 2018
Between:
Chennam setty Ranganayakulu, S/o, O.Yogaiah aged about 45 years, Hindu occ. Buysiness , R/o. Kuruchedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District
...PETITIONER
AND
Road Kuruchedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District
Prakasam District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus that the action of the official respondents No. 7 and 8 is illegal, completely unlawful and highly arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India in calling the Petitioner for participating in civil settlement, besides being violative of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 not to commence any civil settlements with regard to the lands of the Petitioner and never call him for settlement in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2ni«
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 7 not to cause the Petitioner for settlement until disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.
r
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V ANJANEYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: NONE Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 9: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010875242018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 42433/2018
Between:
Chennam Setty Ranganayakulu ...PETITIONER
AND
Sheik Subhani and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VANJANEYA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.
The Court made the following order:
This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India is filed for the following relief;
‘‘to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyonein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the official respondents No 7 and 8 is illegal completely unlawful and highly arbitrary and in violation of Article21
2
of Constitution of India in calling the Petitioner for participating in civil settlement besides being violativeof Principles of natural justice and consequently directthe Respondent Nos 1 and 8 not to commence any civil settlements with regard to the lands of the Petitionerand never call him for settlement in the interest of justiceand pass such...”
is 3. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well asontheprevious adjournment.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, ifany pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SDI- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED; 19/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.42433 of 2018
DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Chennam Setty Ranganayakulu
Sheik Subhani
Shaik Dada Saheb
Ravuri Bala Krishna Rao
Patti Nageswararao
Sure Venkata Satyanarayana
B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
