The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 2119 of 2019 for non-prosecution when no representation was filed on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2119 OF 201Q
Between:
Nagidi Chinna Babu, S/o. Yanadi, Age. 45 Years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Gilakaldindi, Machilipatanam, Krishna District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly
r
0
m the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondent No.2 i n inaction of the slanting legal protection House ^o petitioner to Property bearing H. protect the No.32/324-1, situated at Machilipatnam, dy taking legal Gilakaldindi, action against the who are trying to respondent IMos 3 disturb petitioners and 4 the Civil Court possession by violating passed in 0. S. No. the orders of 231/2013 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently issue a direction to the the petitioner respondent No.2 to against unofficial grant Police aid to respondent as per law.
IAN^1 OF Pf)iQ
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed circumstances stated i praying that in the Nigh Court 'n the affidavit filed i n support of the may be pleased to i petition, the issue direction to 'nlerlm Police Protection to the petitioner respondent No.2 to grant him bearing H to protect the House No.32/324-1. si property of ®''^®tod Gilakaldindi, iegal action against the Machilipatnam by taking respondent Nos.3 arid 4 who are '''Otohng oroers of the Civil Court repeatedly and doing illegal acts of the Writ Petition pending disposal
Counsel for the Petitione PRASAD r(s): SRI THADIKONDA koteshwara
Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2 ; GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents 3 & 4;NONE
The Court made the foifowi ng; ORDER
i
APHC010046812019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2119/2019
Between:
N Ch Babu
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1 .THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India is filed for the following relief:
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyonein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inactionof the respondent No 2 in granting legal protection to petitioner to protect the House Property bearing HNo
2
#
32/3241 situated at Gilakaldindi Machilipatnam by taking legal action against the respondent Nos 3 and 4 whoare trying to disturb petitioners possession by violating the orders of the Civil Court passed in 0 S No 231/2013as arbitrary and illegal and consequently Issue a directionto the respondent No 2 to grant Police aid to the petitioner against unofficial respondent as per law and pass such...”
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance.
- None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal”. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment.
/
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ASr—
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Madhu
PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.2119 of 2019
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Nagidi Chinna Babu
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Station House Officer, Machilipatnam Police Station
Laknke Prabhakara Rao
Laknke Durga
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
