Barre Sreenivasa Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of an FIR was considered. The respondent submitted that the criminal case was compromised before the Lok Adalat. Consequently, the High Court closed the writ petition without observing the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed without costs. Interlocutory applications stood closed.
What the court decided
a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 42071 OF 2nif;
Between:
Barre Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Late Venkateswar Rao Aed about 28 years, Occ Advocate, R/o Sanjeevanagar, Kanchikacherla Village and Mandal Krishna District.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
- The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Machilipatnam.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition under Article 226 survives when the underlying criminal case was compromised before the Lok Adalat.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Barre Sreenivasa Rao
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
Superintendent of Police, Krishna District
- respondent
Station House Officer, P.S.Kanchikacherla
- respondent
Kovilapu Eswar Rao
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/42071/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court