Writ petition closed as no further adjudication survives upon submission by the State that police did not interfere with the pending civil dispute despite a status quo order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH .•
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
-5^ ^
• j
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO "
WRIT PETITION NO: 11559 OF 2017
Between:
Kondeti Lakshmi Narayana, S/o. Obulesappa age 48 years, Hindu, Occ: Cultivation, R/o, Vidapanakal Village and Mandal, AnanthapuramuDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent IS ■ ^ingJJIegal, arbitrary, null and void, abinitio andviolativeofArticles14,21 ^ahd 22 of the tnetia-n Constitution of India besides contrary to the spirit of Rights and personal liberty consequently direct the 4th respondent affairs and civil suit >^^e*tynot to interfere with the petitioner's family ^pending matter and to protect our peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property as per the status quo order in lA No. 61 of 2011 in OS No.46 of 2011, dated: 12.04.2013, which is pending before the Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, Uravakonda,
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 14368 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent herein not to interfere with the petitioner's family affairs and civil disputes which is pending before the competent civil Court and pending disposal of the above writ petition.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 16987 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to grant leave to file additional affidavit in the above WP No. 11559 of 2017.
Counsel for the Petltioner(s): SRI. ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME '
Counsel for the Respondents 4 & 5 : NONE
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010033692017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11559/2017
Between:
Kondeti Lakshmi Narayana,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER;-
This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of theConstitutionof
India, seeking the following relief;
“. ..to declaring the action of the 4th respondentisbeing illegal, arbitrary, null and void, abinitio and violativeofArticles 14 21 and 22 of the Indian Constitution of India besides contrary to the spirit of Human Rights and personal liberty consequently direct the 4th respondent herein not tointerfere with the petitioners family affairs and civil suitpendingmatter and to protect our peaceful possession and enjoymentofthe plaint schedule property as per the status quo orderInlANo61 of 2011 in OS No 46 of 2011 dated 12 04 2013 whichispending before the Honble Junior Civil Judge Uravakonda”
2
- None represented for the petitioner. Heard the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the officialrespondents.
on 3. On hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader forHome instructions submits that despite there is a status quo orderin l.A.No.61 of 2011 in O.S.No.46 of 2011 dated 12.04.2013 against both parties, the both parties quarrelled and filed cases against eachotherandtherefore, the respondent police registered both cases and filedcharge sheets before the concerned Courts and except that the respondentpolicedid not interfere into the petitioner’s civil dispute asallegedandtherefore, the allegations made against the police are false and baseless and therefore, requested to close the Writ Petition asnothingsurvivesfor adjudication in this case.
3
closed.As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand BABU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// To SECTION OFFICER 1. OneCCto SRI. ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI 7 Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies Madhu
. ^
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/03/2024
'V
ORDER
WP.No.11559 of 2017
g 14 AUG 202^ Co
S££S»«ATCHia«J
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Kondeti Lakshmi Narayana
State of Andhra Pradesh
Superintendent of Police, Ananthapuramu District
Circle Inspector of Police, Uravakonda Circle
Ratnam, Sub Inspector of Police, Uravakonda PS
Kondeti Jaya Ramulu
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
