Petitioners sought de-notification of their Chelluru village lands acquired under a 1993 notification and removal from the Section 22A prohibited list. With no representation when listed for dismissal, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 41423 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the 1®*respondent Government, in not taking action on the proposals sent by the k Respondent Nos.2 to 5 herein, to de-notifying the lands of the petitioners under Section.48 of the of L.A. Act, 1894 and further directing the respondents to delete the lands of thepetitionersfromthe prohibited list' under Section 22 (A) of the act as illegal, arbitrary, without Jurisdiction and contrary to provisions ofLandAcquisitionAct, and further direct the 1 St respondent to pass orders on the pending
&
withdrawing (de-notifying ) the lands of the petitioners from proposals of acquisition and consequently direct the respondents to delete the lands of of Ac.9.50 cents of situated in Sy.No.38/7,39/1, the petitioners to an extent 2,3,4 and 5 and also Sy.No.39/Part 3 of Chelluru village. Vizianagaram Notification issued by the District Mandal and District, pursuant to the the 2rd respondent herein, vide No.139 Collector, Vizianagaram District dated 07.01.193, under Section 4 (1) of L.A. Act, 1894,asthesamewas published in G.O.Ms.235/Rev/(k) department dated 07.01.1993. from the prohibited list under Section 22 (A)
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, theHighCourtmaybepleasedto stay all further proceedings including dispossession of the petitioners from ' Ac.9.50 cents of situated in Sy.No.38/7,39/1, their plots out of an extent of .39/Part 3 of Chelluru village, Vizianagaram Mandal 2,3,4 & 5 and also Sy.No, Notification issued by the District Collector, & District, pursuant to the District, the 2ndrespondent herein, vide Notification Vizianagaram Mandal & 4 (1) of L.A. Act, 1894, as the No.139, dated 07.01.1993, under Section same was published in G.O.Ms.235/Rev/(k) departmentdated07.01.1993 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ANAND NAIDU MAMIDI(NotPresent) No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE/LAND Counsel for the Respondents ACQUISITION
The Court made the following: Order
APHC010689602022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3332]
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 41423/2022
Between;
Varada Amaram and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.ANAND NAIDU MAMIDI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Despite listing the matter under the caption "for dismissal",there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows thatthepetitionershaveno interest to prosecute the matter.
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed.
To.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI^O^FFICER
■ !
HIGH COURT
DATED: 30/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.41423 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Should petitioners' lands be de-notified and deleted from the prohibited (22A) list under the Land Acquisition Act 1894?
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Varada Amaram and Others
The State of AP
The District Collector, Vizianagaram District
The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, A.P.I.I.C, Vizianagaram
The Tahsildar, Vizianagaram
Ravi Cheemalapati
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
