Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010030942021
[3332]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDA Y ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2157/2021
Between:
Bonda Hari
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Prad e sh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SARAT BABU PULIP A TI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2.V SURYA KIRAN KU M AR (SC FOR VMRDA and MUDA)
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the p e titioner. This shows that the petitio n er has no interest to prosecute the m a tter.
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
RR
Bonda Hari
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Ravi Cheemalapati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
