B.Mohan Krishna, Chittoor Dist v. Prl Secy, Energy, Infrastructure & Investment Dept. Hyd &2OT

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged proceedings directing retirement at 58 rather than 60 years of age as contrary to statutory provisions. Counsel submitted the petitioner had since retired on superannuation, so no cause survived; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous, with miscellaneous petitions closed.