The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a MeeSeva center operator challenging the cancellation of his center in Ananthapur. The operator submitted that the cause for the petition no longer survives, rendering the case infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATl IN THE HIGH COURT OF (Special Original Jurisdiction)
NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THURSDAY JHE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA THE HON’BLE SRI
WRIT PETITn*^ -^07 OF 2011
Between:
, Occ: USDP Operator, Chakali Nagesh,, S/o. Sunkanna, aged 24 years H No.2-43, Main Road ANCAC Memakal Anjineya Swamy Services, Bommanahal V & M, Ananthapur District, AP - 51 Opp; MRO Office 871
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions rnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondent No.3 in cancelling the petitioner's MeeSeva Center (Nemakal Anjaneya Swamy Services) at Bommanahal Village & Mandal, Ananthapur Dist.. AP vide proceedings Rc. No. DT(M)/9457/2015 dated.28-12-2015, is without authority and without issuing any show cause notice and in contrary to theGOMs No's. I O. dated.18-10-201 I& GO.Ms.No.13, dated.26-08-2013 and the Proceedings vide N0.633/ESD/ Rural/2014, dated. 15-03-2014. as highly arbitrary, bad, illegal and violation of the articles 14 & 21 of theconstitutionofIndiaand set a side the same and consequently direct the respondents not to grant permission to open new MeeSeva/C'itizen Services Center etc., at Bommanahal Village & Mandal, Ananthapur Dist.. AP. .where already petitioner's Mee-SevalCitizen Services Center etc., is functioning in pursuance to the proc. vide Rc. No. DT(M)/9457/2015dated.28-1-2015.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 509 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings vide Re. No. DT(M)/9457/2015,
respondent No.3. pending disposal of the dated.28-12-2015 issued by the such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may writ petition and pass in the interest of Justice and in the circumstances of deems fit and proper in the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. BETHI VENKATESWARLU. Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
APHC010778812016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO; 407/2016
Between:
Chakali Nagesh,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BETHI VENKATESWARLU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 407/2016
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedcounselforthe respondents.
for hearing, learned counsel for the When the matter is taken up in the present Writ Petition does not survive petitioner submits that the cause and no further adjudication is necessary in the presentWritPetition.Therefore the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed asinfructuous There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BETHl VENKATESWARLU Advocate [OPUC]
[OUT]
GSSK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/09/2024
ORDER
ANOf^
I 2 “I FEB 2025
. Current Ueciion
WP.No.407 of 2016
WRIT PETITION DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking directions to restrain the State from granting permission for a new MeeSeva center remains maintainable when the petitioner claims the cause for filing no longer exists
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chakali Nagesh
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
