The petitioner sought permission to exhibit skill games. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survives. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 39435 OF 2015
Between;
Kudipudi Satyanarayana S/o.Appa Rao, aged about 62 years, R/o.D.No. 10-2-30, Chinarangannapalem, Bhimavaram-534203 West Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in granting permission to the petitioner to exhibit and play the skill games viz, Ring through, Ball box. Dart through. Video games and Steel Games on the occasion of Sri Golingeswara Kumara Subrahmanyeswara Swamy Varla Shisti schedule to be held from 16-12-
2015 ^ to 23-12-2015 as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of all cannons of law and justice and consequently direct to accord permission to , the petitioner to exhibit and play skill games.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015^WPMP. NO- 50867 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances ./Stated in the affidavit filed ini support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the business of the petitioner in exhibit and play of skill games on the occasion of Sri Golingeswara o Kumara Subrahmanyeswara Swamy VarlalShasti schedule to be held from 16-12-2015 to 23-12-2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court.
LA. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NQ; 53358 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation dated 12-12-2015 for grant permission to exhibit and play of skill games on the occasion of Sri Golingeswara Varla Sashti schedule to be held formKumaraSubrahmanyeswaraSwamy * 16-12-2015 to 23-12-2015 pending disposal of the above writ Petition in this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner.SRI. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondents No. 1,2,3,4,5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
%
APHC01002670201S
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 39435 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
KUDIPUDI SATYANARAYANA, WG DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND PRL SECRETARY HOME DEPT HYD 4 OTHERS AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counseljfor the Petitioner(s):SRI. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY -.•■5 ; Counsellor the Respondents; 15516/GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
Mr.T.Raghu, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause of action in thisWritPetitiondoesnotsurvive for any further adjudication and has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by Mr.T.Raghu, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, thepresentWritPetition isi_ dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany,shallstandclosed.
Sd/- SHAIK MOHiyRAFI assistan-wre TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTON OFFICER
To,
GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI. SAI High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME
nm
HIGH COURT DATED:05/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.39435 of 2015
o
I:O 01JUL 29?‘| 69.
DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication or has become infructuous?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kudipudi Satyanarayana
State of Andhra Pradesh Department of Home
Superintendent of Police Kakinada
Sub-Divisional Police Officer Ramachandrapuram
Circle Inspector of Police Anaparthi Circle
Station House Officer Bikkavolu Police Station
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
