Writ petition challenging a government order attaching the petitioner's property and seeking registration of a sale deed was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause did not survive. No costs; pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19431 OF 2015
Between:
Mookala Appala Naidu, S/o.Suryanarayana, Aged 60 years R/o.Dr.No.29-22-84, Kalinga nagar, Madhavadhara, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring GO Ms. No.70, dated 3.4.2014 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein attaching the property belonging to the Petitioner is
arbitrary illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3 Respondent herein to entertain the Sale Deed dated3.11.2014submittedby Ihe Petitioner in respect of Plot No.42 situate inSy.No.256-1,256-10,256-9, 256-5, 256-8, 256-11, 256-12 and 256-13 of ' 256-2, 256-3, 256-4 Narsayyapet Village, Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for the ^ purpose of registration and pass such other or furtherordersasthisHon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstancesofthecase.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 25119 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased direct the 2"'^ Respondent herein to processandregistertheSale Deed submitted by the Petitioner dated 3.11.2014 inrespectofPlotNo.42 situate in Sy.No.256-1, 256-10, 256-9, 256-2, 256-3,256-4,256-5,256-8, 256-11 256-12, 256-13 bearing Dr.No.1-90 Of Narsayyapet Village, Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pendingdisposaloftheWrit Petition before this Hon’ble Court pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T NAGARJUNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
V
APHC010039172015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19431/2015
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue aWritof Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring GO Ms. No.70, dated 3.4.2014 issued by the2nd Respondent herein attaching the property belonging to the Petitioner is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3 rd Respondent herein to entertain the Sale Deed dated 3.11.2014 submitted by the Petitioner in respect of Plot No.42 situate in Sy.No.256-1, 256-10,256-9, 256-2, 256-3, 256-4, 256-5, 256-8, 256-11, 256-12 and256- 13 of Narsayyapet Village, Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for the purpose of registration and pass such other or further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
l.T NAGARJUNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S): l.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
Mr.P.Nagendra Babu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petitiondoesnot survive and it has become infructuous and hence, prayedto dismiss the writ petition.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending.
shall stands closed.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// j) ^
SECTION OFFICER
To
- Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED; 04/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19431 of 2015
DISMISSING WP AS INFRACTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mookala Appala Naidu
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps & Registration
The Special Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Joint Sub Registrar, Chodavaram, Visakhapatnam District
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
