Dismissed

K.Venkata Narayana Raju, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Aug 2024WP/36602/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel failed to specify how the matter had become so, resulting in the closure of pending miscellaneous petitions. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions are closed; no order as to costs.

K.Venkata Narayana Raju, Vs The Government… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST

¶5

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 36602 OF 2013

¶9

Between:

¶10

K. Venkata Narayana Raju, S/o. K.Subbarama Raju, Aged about 64 years, Occ: Retired Professor, R/o.H.No.6-1-2R, Chennareddy Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶11

C. Parsu Reddy, S/o. C. Chinnappa Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ: Retired Assistant Director in Agriculture, R/o. H.No.8-208, New Balaji Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶12

...PETITIONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Corporation (CoOp-VII) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government.

¶15

The Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar, for Co-Operative Societies, Govt, of A.P, Hyderabad.

¶16

The District Co - Operative Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District.

¶17

The Divisional Co-Operative Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶18

The Gazetted Officer Co-Operative House Building, Society, Having its registered office at Plot No.21, D.No.8-135, Srinagar Colony, R.C Puram Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. Rep. by its Secretary.

¶19

D. Harinath Reddy, S/ o. D. Gangi Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ; Bank Employee, R/o. Plot No.21, D.No.8-135, Srinagar Colony, R.C Puram Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate^writor direction declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent^issued in Memo No.8641/Co-Op.VII(1)/2013-1 dt.5.7.2013, as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 2nd^respondent to take further action on the enquiry report.

¶22

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 45497 OF 2013)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of the 1st respondent issued in Memo.No.8641/Co-op.VII(1)/ 2013-1, dt.5.7.2013, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶24

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWVMP. NO: 58 OF 2014)

¶25

Between:

¶26

D. Harinath Reddy, S/o. D. Gangi Reddy, Aged about 55^years, Occ: Bank Employee, R/o. Plot No.21, D.No.8-135, Srinagar Colony,^{R.CPuramRoad,} Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶27

...Petitioner/R-6

¶28

AND

¶29

K. Venkata Narayana Raju, S/o. K.Subbarama Raju, Aged^about64 years, Occ: Retired Professor, R/o.H.No.6-1-2R, Chennareddy Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶30

C. Parsu Reddy, S/o. C. Chinnappa Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ: Retired Assistant Director in Agriculture, R/o. H.No.8-208, New Balaji Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶31

.. .Petitioner/Respondents

¶32

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Corporation (CoOp-VII) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government.

¶33

The Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar, for Co-Operative Societies, Govt, of A.P, Hyderabad.

¶34

The District Co - Operative Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District.

¶35

The Divisional Co-Operative Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶36

The Gazetted Officer Co-Operative House Building, Society, Having its registered office at Plot No.21, D.No.8-135, Srinagar Colony, R.C Puram Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. Rep. by its Secretary.

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted in WPMP^{No.45497/2013inWP} No.36602/2013 dt.13.12.2013.

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI O MANOHER REDDY

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI V MALLIK

¶40

Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5 : GP FOR COOPERATION

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶42

APHC010028352013

¶43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SMS AT AMARAVATI m

¶44

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶45

[3330]

¶46

FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST

¶47

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶48

PRESENT

¶49

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36602/201.3

¶50

Between:

¶51

K.Venkata Narayana Raju, and Others

¶52

...PETITIONER{S)

¶53

AND

¶54

The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶55

1.0 MANOHER REDDY

¶56

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.VMALLIK

2.GP FOR COOPERATION

The Court made the following order:-

¶61

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. The learned counsel made an endorsement on the bundle to that extent. However, the learned counsel had not stated any specific reason, how the matter has become infructuous.

¶62

As such, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶63

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶64

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,

¶65

shall stand closed.

¶66

//TRUE COPY//

¶67

Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶68

To,

¶69

SECTION OFFICER

¶70

OneCCto SRI O MANOHER REDDY Advocate [OPUC

¶71

One CC to SRI V MALLIK Advocate [OPUC]

¶72

Two CCs to GP for COOPERATION, High Court of Andhra^Pradesh. [OUT]

¶73

4. Three CD Copies

¶74

Madhu

¶75

HIGH COURT DATED:02/08/2024

¶76

ORDER

¶77

WP.No.36602 of 2013

¶78

O
C5»>
,g 19 AUG 2029
Current Section ^

¶79

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

K.Venkata Narayana Raju, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Venkata Narayana Raju, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Ram Babu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K.Bramhananda Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

Chennu Bhaskar Reddy, Nellore Dist Vs Prl Secy for Coop, Hyd and 4 Ot

Morthe Seetharamacharylu, Vsp. Dist. Vs Prl. Secy., Planning and Coop. Dept. and 4 Ors.

K. Nagendra Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Vadde Mahesh, S/o Lingaiah Vs The State of A.P.