Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel submitting that the matter has become infructuous, though no specific reason was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010545022013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3330]
FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19387/2013
Between:
Morthe Seetharamacharylu, Vsp. Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
Prl Secy Planning Coop Dept 4 Ors and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SITA RAM CHAPARLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.P V VIDYASAGAR
2.GP FOR COOPERATION
2
The Court made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. The learned counsel made an endorsement
on the bundle to that extent. However, the learned counsel had not stated any specific reason, how the matter has become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
Date: 02.08.2024
KBN
3
16
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.19387 of 2013
Date: 02.08.2024
KBN
Morthe Seetharamacharylu
Prl Secy Planning Coop Dept 4 Ors and Others
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
