The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed for quashing an FIR and stopping arrest proceedings because the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the matter after multiple adjournments.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution; all intervening interlocutory applications remain closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHATtAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 36037 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to FIR No. 689/2015 dated 26.10.2015 on the file of the P.M. Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, and to quash the same in so far asthepetitioneris concerned, as being illegal, arbitrary and violativeofArt.14and21ofthe Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to arrest the petitioner in connection with the said FIR.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015 (WPMP. NO: 46010 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the FIR No. 689/2015 dated 26.10.2015 on the file of the P.M. Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, by receiving Photostat copies of thesame
i.A. NO: 2 OF 2015 (WPMP, NO: 46348 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 689/2015 dated 26.10.2015 on the file of the P.M. Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, in so far as the petitioner is concerned, includingthearrestofthe petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition c Counsel for the Petitioner(s): Sri. M KARUNA SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTOLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) , The Court made the following Order:
I
APHC010015852015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
I
WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 36037/2015
Between:
Avula Govardhana Reddy, Vsp. ...PETITIONER
AND
PrI Secy Rev Dept 3 Ors and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M KARUNA SAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.10886/GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTULA
2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
None appeared for the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 13.03.2024, 20.03.2024 & 27.03.2024, there was no representationonbehalf of the petitioner. So, it appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute their writ petition.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications
if any pending, shall stands
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P.VENKAT RAMANA JOINTi^GISTRAR SECTI^WnCER
To,
LA
Writ NS Sec
HIGH COURT
DATED: 03/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.36037 of 2015
.^andh/S}^ f 03 00®'' X. C-Hrentsoowj %£oeapAi^S^
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should proceed with the writ petition when the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the matter.
Avula Govardhana Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam
Station House Officer, P.M. Palem
Sri P. Sitaramaiah
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
